Literature DB >> 12560883

Quality of life after several treatments for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Masashi Kawasaki1, Yukiharu Hasegawa, Shinji Sakano, Yukio Torii, Hideki Warashina.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine quality of life (QOL) after a rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO), primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), or conservative treatment (Conservative). A series of 147 patients with osteoarthritis of the hip were grouped according to treatment into the RAO group ( n = 62), THA group ( n = 40), and Conservative group ( n = 45) (treated with medication and rehabilitation alone). The mean age of the RAO group was 40 years, the THA group 54 years, and the Conservative group 50 years. The mean follow-up periods were 3.6, 3.9, and 3.3 years, respectively. All patients were female. As a control group 609 volunteers participating in a town mass screening program were recruited. QOL was determined using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Each area of QOL was evaluated separately in all of the treatment groups at less than 1 year after therapy, at more than 1 year but less than 5 years, and at more than 5 years. With regard to QOL at less than 1 year after therapy, the Conservative group had significantly higher scores for energy, pain, and emotional reaction than the Control group. With regard to physical mobility, all of the treatment groups showed significantly higher scores than the Control group. With regard to QOL at more than 1 year but less than 5 years, the RAO and THA groups showed significantly higher scores than the Control group regarding physical mobility. Regarding pain, the RAO and Conservative groups showed significantly higher scores than the Control group. With regard to QOL at more than 5 years, for physical mobility all of the treatment groups showed significantly higher scores than the Control group. For pain the RAO group showed significantly higher scores than the Control group. NHP is a useful means for evaluating QOL in patients treated for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12560883     DOI: 10.1007/s007760300005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  5 in total

Review 1.  EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT).

Authors:  W Zhang; M Doherty; N Arden; B Bannwarth; J Bijlsma; K-P Gunther; H J Hauselmann; G Herrero-Beaumont; K Jordan; P Kaklamanis; B Leeb; M Lequesne; S Lohmander; B Mazieres; E Martin-Mola; K Pavelka; A Pendleton; L Punzi; B Swoboda; R Varatojo; G Verbruggen; I Zimmermann-Gorska; M Dougados
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Occupational work and quality of life in osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Elzbieta Łastowiecka; Joanna Bugajska; Andrzej Najmiec; Maria Rell-Bakalarska; Irena Bownik; Anna Jedryka-Góral
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  A comparison of biomechanical changes on femoral head following rotational acetabular osteotomy and eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy in normal cadaveric hip.

Authors:  Ziqing Li; Shiming Yu; Changhe Hou; Yi Chen; Yangchun Zhang; Qiyi Zhai; Bo Bai; Puyi Sheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-01-10

4.  Acute and Subacute Changes in Dynamic Postural Control After Hip Arthroscopy and Postoperative Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Matthew Freke; Matthew King; Kay Crossley; Kevin Sims; Adam Semciw
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.824

5.  Utilization of elective hip and knee arthroplasty by age and payer.

Authors:  Dan Matlock; Mark Earnest; Anne Epstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.176

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.