OBJECTIVE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major problem in intensive care units in most countries. Despite recommendations for screening and isolation of patients with MRSA our perception has been that there is little uniformity in approach in ICUs besides adherence to basic infection control procedures. We thus sought to identify MRSA prevalence and the variation of infection control policy across intensive care units in England. DESIGN AND SETTING: Postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up in English intensive care units. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 217 (96%) ICUs. Marked variation in practice was noted in terms of patient screening, staff screening, infection control procedures, isolation or cohorting of colonised/infected patients, and ward discharge policy. Point prevalence data showed that 16.2% of ICU patients were known to be colonised or infected with MRSA. There was a regional bias, but no difference was noted between high and low prevalence regions in terms of unit demographics or infection control policies. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the lack of consistent policy across English ICUs regarding isolation, screening and discharge practices for MRSA. Prospective studies are urgently needed to determine best practice.
OBJECTIVE: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major problem in intensive care units in most countries. Despite recommendations for screening and isolation of patients with MRSA our perception has been that there is little uniformity in approach in ICUs besides adherence to basic infection control procedures. We thus sought to identify MRSA prevalence and the variation of infection control policy across intensive care units in England. DESIGN AND SETTING: Postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up in English intensive care units. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 217 (96%) ICUs. Marked variation in practice was noted in terms of patient screening, staff screening, infection control procedures, isolation or cohorting of colonised/infectedpatients, and ward discharge policy. Point prevalence data showed that 16.2% of ICU patients were known to be colonised or infected with MRSA. There was a regional bias, but no difference was noted between high and low prevalence regions in terms of unit demographics or infection control policies. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the lack of consistent policy across English ICUs regarding isolation, screening and discharge practices for MRSA. Prospective studies are urgently needed to determine best practice.
Authors: B Ostrowsky; J T Steinberg; B Farr; A H Sohn; R L Sinkowitz-Cochran; W R Jarvis Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Parjam S Zolfaghari; Samantha Packer; Mervyn Singer; Sean P Nair; Jon Bennett; Cale Street; Michael Wilson Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 3.605