PURPOSE: The primary objective was to assess the duration of grade 4 neutropenia (neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) after one cycle of chemotherapy with etoposide, methylprednisolone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in patients randomly assigned to receive one dose of pegfilgrastim or daily filgrastim after chemotherapy. Febrile neutropenia, neutrophil profiles, time to neutrophil recovery, pharmacokinetics, and safety were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open-label, randomized, phase II study was designed to compare the effects of a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (sustained-duration filgrastim) 100 micro g/kg per chemotherapy cycle (n = 33) with daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 5 micro g/kg (n = 33) in patients receiving salvage chemotherapyfor relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. RESULTS: The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups was 69% and 68%, respectively. In addition, the mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia was similar in both groups (2.8 and 2.4 days, respectively). The results for the two groups were also not significantly different for febrile neutropenia, neutrophil profile, time to neutrophil recovery, or toxicity profile. A single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 micro g/kg produced a sustained serum concentration relative to daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim. Filgrastim-treated patients received a median of 11 injections per cycle. CONCLUSION:Pegfilgrastim was safe and well tolerated in this patient population. A single injection of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle provided neutrophil support with safety and efficacy similar to that provided by daily injections of filgrastim. Once-per-cycle administration of pegfilgrastim simplifies the management of neutropenia and may have important clinical benefits for patients and healthcare providers.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The primary objective was to assess the duration of grade 4 neutropenia (neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) after one cycle of chemotherapy with etoposide, methylprednisolone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in patients randomly assigned to receive one dose of pegfilgrastim or daily filgrastim after chemotherapy. Febrile neutropenia, neutrophil profiles, time to neutrophil recovery, pharmacokinetics, and safety were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open-label, randomized, phase II study was designed to compare the effects of a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (sustained-duration filgrastim) 100 micro g/kg per chemotherapy cycle (n = 33) with daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 5 micro g/kg (n = 33) in patients receiving salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. RESULTS: The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups was 69% and 68%, respectively. In addition, the mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia was similar in both groups (2.8 and 2.4 days, respectively). The results for the two groups were also not significantly different for febrile neutropenia, neutrophil profile, time to neutrophil recovery, or toxicity profile. A single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 micro g/kg produced a sustained serum concentration relative to daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim. Filgrastim-treated patients received a median of 11 injections per cycle. CONCLUSION: Pegfilgrastim was safe and well tolerated in this patient population. A single injection of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle provided neutrophil support with safety and efficacy similar to that provided by daily injections of filgrastim. Once-per-cycle administration of pegfilgrastim simplifies the management of neutropenia and may have important clinical benefits for patients and healthcare providers.
Authors: Joseph A Sparano; Abdissa Negassa; Erick Lansigan; Robin Locke; Chamath R De Silva; Peter H Wiernik Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2005 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Dawn L Hershman; Elizabeth T Wilde; Jason D Wright; Donna L Buono; Kevin Kalinsky; Jennifer L Malin; Alfred I Neugut Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edgar Petru; Christian F Singer; Stephan Polterauer; Arik Galid; Christian Schauer; Johann Klocker; Michael Seifert; Alexander Reinthaller; Christoph Benedicic; Michael Hubalek; Lukas Hefler; Christian Marth; Tonja Scholl-Firon; Gerhard Bogner; Alain-Gustave Zeimet Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2015-10-15
Authors: Grace Kam; Richard Yiu; Yvonne Loh; Ai Leen Ang; Ling Ling Yueh; Yeow Tee Goh; Gee Chuan Wong Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sheri L Spunt; Helen Irving; Jami Frost; Leonard Sender; Matthew Guo; Bing-Bing Yang; Lyndah Dreiling; Victor M Santana Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-02-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D Almenar; J Mayans; O Juan; J M Garcia Bueno; J I Jalon Lopez; A Frau; M Guinot; P Cerezuela; E Garcia Buscalla; J A Gasquet; J Sanchez Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 2.520