AIMS: To investigate the prognostic relevance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor Flt-1 in nephroblastoma and whether tumour microvessel density (MVD) immunoreactivity, determined by the CD31 antigen, is related to the expression of VEGF and Flt-1. METHODS: The expression of VEGF and Flt-1 and MVD were investigated by means of immunohistochemical analysis in 62 Wilms's tumours. Patients were treated preoperatively with chemotherapy and had a mean follow up of 5.7 years. RESULTS: In general, VEGF and Flt-1 were expressed in normal kidney parenchyma and to a variable extent in the three main components of Wilms's tumour, namely: the blastemal, epithelial, and stromal cells. In tumour tissue, 52% and 47% of blastemal cells were positive for VEGF and Flt-1, respectively. A non-significant correlation was found between the expression of VEGF and Flt-1 in blastemal and epithelial cells and the clinicopathological stage. MVD was significantly higher in VEGF and Flt-1 positive tumours than in VEGF and Flt-1 negative tumours. Univariate analysis showed that the expression of VEGF and Flt-1 in blastemal cells was indicative of clinical progression and tumour specific survival. In addition, MVD expression was indicative of clinical progression. Epithelial staining was of no prognostic value. In a multivariate analysis, VEGF protein expression by blastemal cells was an independent prognostic marker for clinical progression. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that VEGF and Flt-1 protein expression are closely related to MVD and seem to be an important predictor for poor prognosis in treated patients with Wilms's tumour. Therefore, the expression of these molecules in primary Wilms's tumour may be useful in identifying those patients at high risk of tumour recurrence and in guiding antiangiogenic treatment.
AIMS: To investigate the prognostic relevance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor Flt-1 in nephroblastoma and whether tumour microvessel density (MVD) immunoreactivity, determined by the CD31 antigen, is related to the expression of VEGF and Flt-1. METHODS: The expression of VEGF and Flt-1 and MVD were investigated by means of immunohistochemical analysis in 62 Wilms's tumours. Patients were treated preoperatively with chemotherapy and had a mean follow up of 5.7 years. RESULTS: In general, VEGF and Flt-1 were expressed in normal kidney parenchyma and to a variable extent in the three main components of Wilms's tumour, namely: the blastemal, epithelial, and stromal cells. In tumour tissue, 52% and 47% of blastemal cells were positive for VEGF and Flt-1, respectively. A non-significant correlation was found between the expression of VEGF and Flt-1 in blastemal and epithelial cells and the clinicopathological stage. MVD was significantly higher in VEGF and Flt-1 positive tumours than in VEGF and Flt-1 negative tumours. Univariate analysis showed that the expression of VEGF and Flt-1 in blastemal cells was indicative of clinical progression and tumour specific survival. In addition, MVD expression was indicative of clinical progression. Epithelial staining was of no prognostic value. In a multivariate analysis, VEGF protein expression by blastemal cells was an independent prognostic marker for clinical progression. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that VEGF and Flt-1 protein expression are closely related to MVD and seem to be an important predictor for poor prognosis in treated patients with Wilms's tumour. Therefore, the expression of these molecules in primary Wilms's tumour may be useful in identifying those patients at high risk of tumour recurrence and in guiding antiangiogenic treatment.
Authors: G Gasparini; M Toi; M Gion; P Verderio; R Dittadi; M Hanatani; I Matsubara; O Vinante; E Bonoldi; P Boracchi; C Gatti; H Suzuki; T Tominaga Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1997-01-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A Obermair; P Kohlberger; D Bancher-Todesca; C Tempfer; G Sliutz; S Leodolter; A Reinthaller; C Kainz; G Breitenecker; G Gitsch Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: G Fontanini; D Bigini; S Vignati; F Basolo; A Mussi; M Lucchi; S Chine; C A Angeletti; A L Harris; G Bevilacqua Journal: J Pathol Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Manuela Eppenberger; Inti Zlobec; Daniel Baumhoer; Luigi Terracciano; Alessandro Lugli Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Alexander Schultze; Isabel Ben Batalla; Sabine Riethdorf; Michael Bubenheim; Emre Yekebas; Andreas Erbersdobler; Uta Reichelt; Katharina E Effenberger; Thomas Schmidt; Jakob R Izbicki; Carsten Bokemeyer; Klaus Pantel; Walter Fiedler; Sonja Loges Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2012-04-08 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Yari Ciribilli; Virginia Andreotti; Daniel Menendez; Jan-Stephan Langen; Gilbert Schoenfelder; Michael A Resnick; Alberto Inga Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-04-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eugene B Cone; Stewart S Dalton; Megan Van Noord; Elizabeth T Tracy; Henry E Rice; Jonathan C Routh Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 7.450