Literature DB >> 12559084

Quality assurance in surgical oncology. Colorectal cancer as an example.

Ulf Gunnarsson1.   

Abstract

Quality assurance in surgical oncology is a field of growing importance. National, regional and local systems have been built up in many countries. Often the quality assurance projects are linked to different registers. The advantage of such a link is the possibility of obtaining population-based data from unselected health care institutions. Few discussions of results from such projects have been published. Quality assurance of colorectal cancer surgery implies the development and use of systems for improvement all the way from detection of the cancer to the outcome as survival and patient satisfaction. To achieve this we must know what methods are being used and the outcome of our treatments. Designing processes for improvement necessitates careful planning, including decisions about end-points. Some crucial issues are discussed step-by-step in the present paper. In addition to auditing and providing collegial feedback, quality assurance is a tool for closing the gap between clinical practice and evidence based medicine and for creating new evidences as well as monitoring the introduction of new techniques and their effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12559084     DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  7 in total

1.  Outcome for stage II and III rectal and colon cancer equally good after treatment improvement over three decades.

Authors:  Joern Fischer; Fischer Joern; Gunter Hellmich; Hellmich Gunter; Thomas Jackisch; Jackisch Thomas; Erik Puffer; Puffer Erik; Jörg Zimmer; Zimmer Jörg; Dorothea Bleyl; Bleyl Dorothea; Thomas Kittner; Kittner Thomas; Helmut Witzigmann; Witzigmann Helmut; Sigmar Stelzner; Stelzner Sigmar
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Volume of blood loss during surgery for colon cancer is a risk determinant for future small bowel obstruction caused by recurrence--a population-based epidemiological study.

Authors:  Malin Mörner; Ulf Gunnarsson; Pia Jestin; Monika Egenvall
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery.

Authors:  Ulf Fränneby; Gabriel Sandblom; Pär Nordin; Olof Nyrén; Ulf Gunnarsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Discordance between the patient's and surgeon's perception of complications following hernia surgery.

Authors:  U Fränneby; U Gunnarsson; S Wollert; G Sandblom
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Use of administrative hospital registry data and a civil registry to measure survival and other outcomes after cancer.

Authors:  Henrik Toft Sørensen; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  Risk Factors for Surgical Complications in Ventral Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Mikael Lindmark; Karin Strigård; Thyra Löwenmark; Ursula Dahlstrand; Ulf Gunnarsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Advanced Hysteroscopic Surgery: Quality Assurance in Teaching Hospitals.

Authors:  Mark M S Erian; Glenda R McLaren; Anna-Marie Erian
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.