Literature DB >> 12558778

Complications of central venous access devices in paediatric haemophilia patients.

J A Domm1, M G Hudson, R L Janco.   

Abstract

We conducted a retrospective survey of our experience with central venous access devices (CVADs) implanted in children with haemophilia seen at the Vanderbilt Hemostasis-Thrombosis Clinic from 1986 to 2000. Following discussion with parents on the merits and risks associated with the use of CVADs for immune tolerance induction or factor prophylaxis, catheters were inserted under sterile technique in the operating room. One nurse provided demonstration and teaching about catheter care and access. Thirty central venous catheters were inserted in 22 children. Our survey revealed that the two most common complications associated with central venous catheters were bacteraemia and thrombosis. We found a sepsis rate of 0.30/1000 catheter-days or one episode of bacteraemia for every 3346 days of catheter use. The thrombosis rate of our cohort was 0.13/1000 catheter-days or one episode of thrombosis for every 7529 days of catheter use. Uncomplicated venous access is essential in children with severe haemophilia who require prophylaxis or immune tolerance induction. While infection was the most common complication observed in our series, we experienced a lower overall infection rate than several reported series. Catheter thrombosis and subsequent obstruction may occur as a result of intraluminal fibrin deposits. We conclude that the use of implantable central venous catheters is an effective method for accessing children with haemophilia. We accept that the benefits of CVADs in the treatment of paediatric haemophilia patients outweigh the previously documented risks. Future prospective studies should be designed to define all associated risks and to determine effective strategies to reduce them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12558778     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2003.00692.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  5 in total

1.  Bacterial contamination of central venous catheters during insertion: a double blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  N J Hall; J Hartley; N Ade-Ajayi; K Laughlan; D Roebuck; T Kleidon; D Powis; A Pierro
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Complete prevention of blood loss with self-sealing haemostatic needles.

Authors:  Mikyung Shin; Sung-Gurl Park; Byung-Chang Oh; Keumyeon Kim; Seongyeon Jo; Moon Sue Lee; Seok Song Oh; Seon-Hui Hong; Eui-Cheol Shin; Ki-Suk Kim; Sun-Woong Kang; Haeshin Lee
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 3.  Non-catheter associated venous thrombosis in hemophilia A and B. A critical review of all reported cases.

Authors:  Antonio Girolami; Raffaella Scandellari; Ezio Zanon; Roberto Sartori; Bruno Girolami
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Deep venous thrombosis screening in patients with inherited bleeding disorders and central venous catheters.

Authors:  C R Cost; J M Journeycake
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.287

5.  Systemic AL amyloidosis with acquired factor X deficiency: A study of perioperative bleeding risk and treatment outcomes in 60 patients.

Authors:  Carrie A Thompson; Robert Kyle; Morie Gertz; John Heit; Rajiv Pruthi; Animesh Pardanani
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.047

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.