Literature DB >> 12558484

Embryo donation at an Australian university in-vitro fertilisation clinic: issues and outcomes.

Gabor T Kovacs1, Sue A Breheny, Melinda J Dear.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the choices of couples relinquishing frozen embryos and the outcomes of embryo donation at a major in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinic. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective audit of 11.5 years of data (1991-2002) from the Monash University IVF clinic, Melbourne. PARTICIPANTS: Couples who make decisions regarding the fate of their frozen embryos, and recipient couples taking part in embryo adoption. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Couples' choices with regard to the fate of their frozen embryos, and the outcome of donated embryo treatment cycles.
RESULTS: Of 1246 couples relinquishing frozen embryos, 1116 (89.5%) opted to discard rather than donate their embryos. Sixty-six per cent of donated embryos survived thawing. From donated-embryo transfer to 50 women in 92 cycles, a 17.4% pregnancy rate per transfer cycle was achieved, and 10 women delivered 11 healthy babies at term. At the time of our audit there were 98 couples on the waiting list to adopt embryos.
CONCLUSIONS: It is worth considering how couples can be encouraged to donate rather than discard their surplus frozen embryos. An educational program on relevant legal, social and clinical issues may facilitate this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12558484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  10 in total

1.  What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Matthew Lee; Jennifer Harrington; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells.

Authors:  K Devolder
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Procreative beneficence and in vitro gametogenesis.

Authors:  Hannah Bourne; Thomas Douglas; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2012-09

4.  Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Karen Steinhauser; Corrine Voils; Emily Namey; Carolyn Alexander; Brandon Bankowski; Robert Cook-Deegan; William C Dodson; Elena Gates; Emily S Jungheim; Peter G McGovern; Evan R Myers; Barbara Osborn; William Schlaff; Jeremy Sugarman; James A Tulsky; David Walmer; Ruth R Faden; Edward Wallach
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Ethical attitudes of German specialists in reproductive medicine and legal regulation of preimplantation sex selection in Germany.

Authors:  Miriam Wilhelm; Edgar Dahl; Henry Alexander; Elmar Brähler; Yve Stöbel-Richter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Using fertile couples as embryo donors: An ethical dilemma.

Authors:  Leila Alizadeh; Reza Omani Samani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-03

7.  Gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy in australia: the social context and regulatory framework.

Authors:  Karin Hammarberg; Louise Johnson; Tracey Petrillo
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-02-20

8.  Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; G Sydsjö; M Bladh; C Lampic
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Embryo donation and understanding of kinship: the impact of law and policy.

Authors:  Jenni Millbank; Anita Stuhmcke; Isabel Karpin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Embryo donation: Survey of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients and randomized trial of complimentary counseling.

Authors:  Alison E Zimon; Donald S Shepard; Jeffrey Prottas; Kristin L Rooney; Jeanie Ungerleider; Yara A Halasa-Rappel; Denny Sakkas; Selwyn P Oskowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.