Literature DB >> 12558304

The effect of augmented hemodynamics on blood flow during arteriovenous carbon dioxide removal.

Jason B Jayroe1, Dongfang Wang, Donald J Deyo, Scott K Alpard, Akhil Bidani, Joseph B Zwischenberger.   

Abstract

Arteriovenous carbon dioxide removal (AVCO2R) as an alternative treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome uses a low resistance gas exchanger in a simple arteriovenous shunt to achieve total CO2 removal and allow lung rest. We have previously shown in our clinically relevant LD40 ovine model of smoke/burn induced acute respiratory distress syndrome that AVCO2R allows significant decreases in respiratory rate, tidal volume, peak airway pressure, and FiO2, as compared with standard mechanical ventilation. In addition, we have shown in a prospective randomized outcomes study that AVCO2R increases ventilator free days, decreases ventilator dependent days, and significantly improves survival. The purpose of this study is to further define the limits of AVCO2R through hemodynamic augmentation and evaluation of peak end expiratory pressure (PEEP). Administration of an alpha agonist (phenylephrine) and a beta agonist (isoproterenol) increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO), respectively. MAP increases ranged from 2.4% to 94.4% and CO increases ranged from 33% to 146%. Phenylephrine caused elevations in MAP (2.4-94.4%) and AVCO2R flow (9-67%), and CO never decreased more than 10%. Isoproterenol administration increased CO (33-146%), decreased MAP (9-54%), and decreased AVCO2R flow (11-42%). In a second group, PEEP was increased stepwise from 0 (baseline) to 20 cm H2O. Increasing PEEP did not result in significant hemodynamic changes (< 10% change from baseline PEEP) for MAP, CO, or AVCO2R flow. In conclusion, alpha agonist administration increased AVCO2R blood flow, whereas beta agonist administration decreased MAP and AVCO2R blood flow, despite CO elevation. Various levels of PEEP are well tolerated and thus allow a range of options during AVCO2R.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12558304     DOI: 10.1097/00002480-200301000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  5 in total

1.  A novel pump-driven veno-venous gas exchange system during extracorporeal CO2-removal.

Authors:  Alexander Hermann; Katharina Riss; Peter Schellongowski; Andja Bojic; Philipp Wohlfarth; Oliver Robak; Wolfgang R Sperr; Thomas Staudinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  An update on interventional lung assist devices and their role in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Marc-Alexander von Mach; Joachim Kaes; Babatunde Omogbehin; Ingo Sagoschen; Jascha Wiechelt; Kristina Kaiser; Oliver Sauer; Ludwig Sacha Weilemann
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Cardiovascular stability during arteriovenous extracorporeal therapy: a randomized controlled study in lambs with acute lung injury.

Authors:  Balagangadhar R Totapally; Jeffrey B Sussmane; Dan Torbati; Javier Gelvez; Harun Fakioglu; Yongming Mao; Jose L Olarte; Jack Wolfsdorf
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Thrombotic Complications during Interventional Lung Assist: Case Series.

Authors:  Eun Jung Kim; Woo Hyun Cho; Eun Young Ahn; Dae Gon Ryu; Seung Eun Lee; Doo Soo Jeon; Yun Seong Kim; Bong Soo Son; Do Hyung Kim
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2015-01-29

5.  Pumpless extracorporeal interventional lung assist in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Markus Zimmermann; Thomas Bein; Matthias Arlt; Alois Philipp; Leopold Rupprecht; Thomas Mueller; Matthias Lubnow; Bernhard M Graf; Hans J Schlitt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.