Literature DB >> 12557217

Regeneration of the ear after wounding in different mouse strains is dependent on the severity of wound trauma.

Charissa Rajnoch1, Sharon Ferguson, Anthony D Metcalfe, Sarah E Herrick, Hayley S Willis, Mark W J Ferguson.   

Abstract

The replacement and restoration of tissue mass after organ damage or injury in adult higher vertebrates is critical to the architecture and function of the organ. If replacement occurs with scar tissue, this often results in adverse effects on function and growth as well as an undesirable cosmetic appearance. However, certain mammals, such as the MRL/MpJ mouse, have shown a restricted capacity for regeneration, rather than scar tissue formation, after an excisional ear punch wound. To investigate the changes in tissue architecture leading to ear wound closure, initial ear wounding studies with a 2-mm clinical biopsy punch were performed on MRL/MpJ mice, by using C57BL/6 mice as a nonregenerative control strain. In contrast to previously reported studies on mouse ear regeneration, we observed that C57BL/6 mice in fact showed a limited regenerative capacity. One explanation for this difference could be attributed to the method of wounding used; both previous studies on mouse ear regeneration used a thumb punch, whereas our approach was to use a clinical biopsy punch. This approach led us to further investigate whether the severity of trauma applied influenced the rate of wound healing. We, therefore, compared the effects of the sharp clinical biopsy punch with that of a cruder thumb punch, and introduced a third strain of mouse, Balb/c, known to be a slow-healing strain. A new method to quantify ear punch hole closure was developed and a histologic investigation conducted up to 4 months after wounding. Image analysis data showed a reduction in original ear wound area of 85% in MRL/MpJ mice at 4 weeks and of 91.7% over 4 months by using a biopsy punch. In contrast, the crude thumb punch methodology resulted in an increase in wound area of up to 58% in Balb/c ears; thought to be due to increased necrosis of the wound site. All biopsy-punched wound areas plateaued in healing between days 28 and 112. Only 5 of 80 MRL/MpJ mouse ears showed no residual holes macroscopically after 28 days. Histologically, all strains of mice healed their ear wounds in a similar manner involving re-epithelialization, blastema-like formation, dermal extension, blood vessel formation, chondrogenesis, folliculogenesis, and skeletal muscle and fat differentiation. However, all regenerative features were more pronounced and accelerated in MRL/MpJ mice when compared with C57BL/6 and Balb/c biopsy-punched mouse ears. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12557217     DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.10242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  26 in total

Review 1.  Applied Healthspan engineering.

Authors:  James W Larrick; Andrew Mendelsohn
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 4.663

2.  Denervation affects regenerative responses in MRL/MpJ and repair in C57BL/6 ear wounds.

Authors:  Gemma Buckley; Jason Wong; Anthony D Metcalfe; Mark W J Ferguson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Tissue engineering of replacement skin: the crossroads of biomaterials, wound healing, embryonic development, stem cells and regeneration.

Authors:  Anthony D Metcalfe; Mark W J Ferguson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  An Articular Cartilage Repair Model in Common C57Bl/6 Mice.

Authors:  Masatake Matsuoka; Tomohiro Onodera; Fumio Sasazawa; Daisuke Momma; Rikiya Baba; Kazutoshi Hontani; Norimasa Iwasaki
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 5.  Inflammation and Its Correlates in Regenerative Wound Healing: An Alternate Perspective.

Authors:  Dmitri Gourevitch; Andrew V Kossenkov; Yong Zhang; Lise Clark; Celia Chang; Louise C Showe; Ellen Heber-Katz
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  The role of genetics in estrogen responses: a critical piece of an intricate puzzle.

Authors:  Emma H Wall; Sylvia C Hewitt; Laure K Case; Chin-Yo Lin; Kenneth S Korach; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  An ear punch model for studying the effect of radiation on wound healing.

Authors:  Divino Deoliveira; Yiqun Jiao; Joel R Ross; Kayla Corbin; Qizhen Xiao; Greta Toncheva; Colin Anderson-Evans; Terry T Yoshizumi; Benny J Chen; Nelson J Chao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Welfare and Scientific Considerations of Tattooing and Ear Tagging for Mouse Identification.

Authors:  Johnny V Roughan; Tatum Sevenoaks
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Dermal collagen and lipid deposition correlate with tissue swelling and hydraulic conductivity in murine primary lymphedema.

Authors:  Joseph M Rutkowski; Carl Erik Markhus; Christina C Gyenge; Kari Alitalo; Helge Wiig; Melody A Swartz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Tissue profiling MALDI mass spectrometry reveals prominent calcium-binding proteins in the proteome of regenerative MRL mouse wounds.

Authors:  Robert L Caldwell; Susan R Opalenik; Jeffrey M Davidson; Richard M Caprioli; Lillian B Nanney
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.