Literature DB >> 12557182

Strategies for structural proteomics of prokaryotes: Quantifying the advantages of studying orthologous proteins and of using both NMR and X-ray crystallography approaches.

Alexei Savchenko1, Adelinda Yee, Anna Khachatryan, Tatiana Skarina, Elena Evdokimova, Marina Pavlova, Anthony Semesi, Julian Northey, Steven Beasley, Ning Lan, Rajdeep Das, Mark Gerstein, Cheryl H Arrowmith, Aled M Edwards.   

Abstract

Only about half of non-membrane-bound proteins encoded by either bacterial or archaeal genomes are soluble when expressed in Escherichia coli (Yee et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:1825-1830; Christendat et al., Prog Biophys Mol Biol 200;73:339-345). This property limits genome-scale functional and structural proteomics studies, which depend on having a recombinant, soluble version of each protein. An emerging strategy to increase the probability of deriving a soluble derivative of a protein is to study different sequence homologues of the same protein, including representatives from thermophilic organisms, based on the assumption that the stability of these proteins will facilitate structural analysis. To estimate the relative merits of this strategy, we compared the recombinant expression, solubility, and suitability for structural analysis by NMR and/or X-ray crystallography for 68 pairs of homologous proteins from E. coli and Thermotoga maritima. A sample suitable for structural studies was obtained for 62 of the 68 pairs of homologs under standardized growth and purification procedures. Fourteen (eight E. coli and six T. maritima proteins) samples generated NMR spectra of a quality suitable for structure determination and 30 (14 E. coli and 16 T. maritima proteins) samples formed crystals. Only three (one E. coli and two T. maritima proteins) samples both crystallized and had excellent NMR properties. The conclusions from this work are: (1) The inclusion of even a single ortholog of a target protein increases the number of samples for structural studies almost twofold; (2) there was no clear advantage to the use of thermophilic proteins to generate samples for structural studies; and (3) for the small proteins analyzed here, the use of both NMR and crystallography approaches almost doubled the number of samples for structural studies. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12557182     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  26 in total

1.  Expression screening, protein purification and NMR analysis of human protein domains for structural genomics.

Authors:  G E Folkers; B N M van Buuren; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2004

2.  Structure of minimal tetratricopeptide repeat domain protein Tah1 reveals mechanism of its interaction with Pih1 and Hsp90.

Authors:  Beatriz Jiménez; Francisca Ugwu; Rongmin Zhao; Leticia Ortí; Taras Makhnevych; Antonio Pineda-Lucena; Walid A Houry
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Comparative analysis and "expression space" coverage of the production of prokaryotic membrane proteins for structural genomics.

Authors:  Sachin Surade; Markus Klein; Peggy C Stolt-Bergner; Cornelia Muenke; Ankita Roy; Hartmut Michel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Unsupervised guided docking of covalently bound ligands.

Authors:  Xavier Fradera; Jasmit Kaur; Jordi Mestres
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  High-throughput production of prokaryotic membrane proteins.

Authors:  Elena Dobrovetsky; Ming Liang Lu; Ronit Andorn-Broza; Galina Khutoreskaya; James E Bray; Alexei Savchenko; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Aled M Edwards; Christopher M Koth
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2005

6.  Effect of N-terminal solubility enhancing fusion proteins on yield of purified target protein.

Authors:  Martin Hammarström; Esmeralda A Woestenenk; Niklas Hellgren; Torleif Härd; Helena Berglund
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2006-07-19

Review 7.  The impact of extremophiles on structural genomics (and vice versa).

Authors:  Francis E Jenney; Michael W W Adams
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Fluorescent probe for high-throughput screening of membrane protein expression.

Authors:  A E Backmark; N Olivier; A Snijder; E Gordon; N Dekker; A D Ferguson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Bacterial expression strategies for human angiogenesis proteins.

Authors:  L J Dieckman; W Zhang; D J Rodi; M I Donnelly; F R Collart
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2006-03

10.  Refolding out of guanidine hydrochloride is an effective approach for high-throughput structural studies of small proteins.

Authors:  Karen L Maxwell; Diane Bona; Chengsong Liu; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Aled M Edwards
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.