Literature DB >> 12556783

A comparative study of postendoscopic sphincterotomy complications with various types of electrosurgical current in patients with choledocholithiasis.

Gerasimos Stefanidis1, George Karamanolis, Nikos Viazis, Spiros Sgouros, Efthimia Papadopoulou, Konstantinos Ntatsakis, Apostolos Mantides, Helias Nastos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether the type of electrosurgical current used for endoscopic sphincterotomy influences the frequency of postsphincterotomy complications is unknown.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-six patients with choledocholithiasis were prospectively randomized to undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy with pure cutting current (n = 62, Group A), blended current (n = 62, Group B), or pure cutting initially followed by blended current (n = 62, Group C). Serum concentrations of amylase and lipase were evaluated in all patients 12 and 24 hours after sphincterotomy. Clinical pancreatitis was classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Postsphincterotomy bleeding was defined as a decrease in hematocrit of greater than 5%.
RESULTS: Serum concentrations of amylase and lipase were greater in Groups B and C at 12 and 24 hours after the procedure, as compared with Group A. Clinical mild pancreatitis occurred in 2 patients in Group A (3.2%), 8 in Group B (12.9%), and in 8 in Group C (12.9%). The differences were statistically significant for Group A compared with either Group B or Group C (p = 0.048). Postsphincterotomy bleeding occurred in 3 patients (1.6%), one in each group.
CONCLUSION: The use of pure cutting electrosurgical current during endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis is associated with a lesser degree of pancreatic enzyme elevation and lower frequency of pancreatitis, whereas bleeding is not increased compared with blended current. Changing from pure cutting to blended current after the first 3 to 5 mm of the incision is associated with an increased rate of complications compared to the use of pure cutting current for the entire sphincterotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12556783     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2003.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  14 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic papillotomy, syn. sphincterotomy: results from the past two years.

Authors:  Meinhard Classen; Peter Born
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-04

2.  Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Bilal Kharbutli; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Endocut Versus Conventional Blended Electrosurgical Current for Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy: A Meta-Analysis of Complications.

Authors:  De-Feng Li; Mei-Feng Yang; Xin Chang; Nan-Nan Wang; Fang-Fang Tan; Hai-Na Xie; Xue Fang; Shu-Ling Wang; Wei Fan; Jian-Yao Wang; Zhi-Chao Yu; Cheng Wei; Feng Xiong; Ting-Ting Liu; Ming-Han Luo; Li-Sheng Wang; Zhao-Shen Li; Jun Yao; Yu Bai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them.

Authors:  Nicholas M Szary; Firas H Al-Kawas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-08

5.  Impact of pancreatic stent caliber on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram pancreatitis rates in patients with confirmed sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Authors:  Jayapal Ramesh; Hwasoon Kim; Kartika Reddy; Shyam Varadarajulu; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.029

6.  Is there a safer electrosurgical current for endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with liver cirrhosis?

Authors:  Erkan Parlak; Aydın Şeref Köksal; Erkin Öztaş; Selçuk Dişibeyaz; Bülent Ödemiş; Mahmut Yüksel; Hakan Yıldız; Nurgül Şaşmaz; Burhan Şahin
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 7.  Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.

Authors:  Ayman M Abdel Aziz; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Early successes and late failures in the prevention of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  John G Lieb; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Authors:  F Donnellan; Michael F Byrne
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Does rectal indomethacin given for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis increase bleeding after biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy or cardiovascular mortality?: Post hoc analysis using prospective clinical trial data.

Authors:  Árpád Patai; Norbert Solymosi; Árpád V Patai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.