Literature DB >> 12556676

Cardiogenic shock: a summary of the randomized SHOCK trial.

Venu Menon1, Rupert Fincke.   

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is the most common cause of death for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. The Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial randomly assigned 302 patients with predominant left ventricular failure following an acute myocardial infarction to a strategy of emergency revascularization or initial medical stabilization. Emergency revascularization by either coronary artery bypass grafting or angioplasty was required within 6 hours of randomization. Patients assigned to initial medical stabilization could undergo delayed revascularization at a minimum of 54 hours post-randomization. The primary end point of the study was 30-day all-cause mortality. Overall survival at 30 days did not differ significantly between the emergency revascularization and initial medical stabilization groups (53% vs. 44%; p=0.109). However, at the 6- and 12-month follow-up, there was a significant survival benefit with early revascularization (50% vs. 37%; p=0.027 and 47% vs. 34%; p=0.025, respectively). The benefit appeared to be greatest for those less than 75 years of age, with 20 lives saved at 6 months per 100 patients treated. According to the results of the SHOCK trial, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for myocardial infarction now recommend emergency revascularization for patients younger than 75 years with cardiogenic shock. Copyright 2003 CHF, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12556676     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2003.tb00020.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Congest Heart Fail        ISSN: 1527-5299


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical circulatory support in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Igor D Gregoric
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

2.  One-year outcome and survival analysis of deferred ventricular septal repair in cardiogenic shock supported with mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Jahanzeb Malik; Faizan Younus; Asmara Malik; Muhammad Umar Farooq; Ahmed Kamal; Muhammad Shoaib; Hesham Naeem; Ghazanfar Rana; Abdul Sattar Rana; Muhammad Usman; Shahid Khalil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Decade-Long Trends (2001-2011) in the Incidence and Hospital Death Rates Associated with the In-Hospital Development of Cardiogenic Shock after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Raghavendra Charan P Makam; Jorge Yarzebski; David D McManus; Darleen Lessard; Joel M Gore
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-02-16

4.  In-Hospital Outcome of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results from Royal Hospital Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry, Oman.

Authors:  Mohammad S Islam; Prashanth Panduranga; Mohammed Al-Mukhaini; Abdullah Al-Riyami; Mohammad El-Deeb; Said Abdul Rahman; Mohammed B Al-Riyami
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-01

Review 5.  Current Concepts and New Trends in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Theodora Benedek; Dan Dobreanu
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2015-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.