Literature DB >> 12556649

The effects of amlodipine compared to losartan in patients with mild to moderately severe hypertension.

Robert A Phillips1, Robert A Kloner, Richard H Grimm, Myron Weinberger.   

Abstract

The calcium channel blocker amlodipine and angiotensin II receptor blocker losartan, with or without hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), were compared for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Following a 2-week placebo run-in, 440 adults (45-80 years old) were randomized to receive either amlodipine 5 mg once daily or losartan 50 mg once daily. Patients who failed to meet the sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) reduction goal of <or=90 mm Hg after 6 weeks had their dose increased to 10 mg amlodipine or had 12.5 mg of HCTZ added to the losartan 50 mg. A total of 42.3% of losartan and 43.6% of amlodipine subjects achieved a diastolic BP of <or=90 mm Hg at initial dose (low dose). Of those who completed treatment at the low dose, 71% of the amlodipine- and 81% of the losartan-treated patients met BP goal. This difference was not statistically significant. Of those who received a dosage adjustment, a significantly greater percentage of amlodipine-treated patients (59%) than losartan/HCTZ-treated patients (42%) reached BP goal at the last visit (p=0.009). Including both high- and low-dose subjects, 63.8% of amlodipine and 55.1% of losartan patients achieved a diastolic BP of <or=90 mm Hg at the last maintenance visit; this difference was not significant (p=0.07). Overall, reductions in mean sitting BP from baseline to the end of treatment were significantly greater in the amlodipine group than in the losartan group for both diastolic BP (-12.6 vs. -10.3 mm Hg; p=0.002) and systolic BP (-16.1 vs. -13.7 mm Hg; p=0.018). Additionally, the response rate was significantly greater after treatment with amlodipine than with losartan in African Americans (62.5% vs. 41.4%; p=0.033) and the other mostly Hispanic patients (67.7% vs. 53.5%; p=0.039). Both treatment groups showed significant reductions from baseline in 24-hour ambulatory BP at the end of treatment, with no difference between them. Adverse events were consistent with the safety profile of each drug. It is concluded that, while both amlodipine and losartan demonstrated a significant benefit for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, there were greater reductions in most BP measurements following treatment with amlodipine in comparison to losartan with or without HCTZ. Copyright 2003 Le Jacq Communications, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12556649      PMCID: PMC8101887          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01416.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  25 in total

1.  Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  E J Lewis; L G Hunsicker; W R Clarke; T Berl; M A Pohl; J B Lewis; E Ritz; R C Atkins; R Rohde; I Raz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The application of meta-analysis in assessing racial differences in the effects of antihypertensive medication.

Authors:  P Messeri; S Workman; C Saunders; C Francis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Comparison of angiotensin II receptor blockers: impact of missed doses of candesartan cilexetil and losartan in systemic hypertension.

Authors:  G Mancia; R Dell'Oro; C Turri; G Grassi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-11-18       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).

Authors:  M J Brown; C R Palmer; A Castaigne; P W de Leeuw; G Mancia; T Rosenthal; L M Ruilope
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study.

Authors:  L Hansson; T Hedner; P Lund-Johansen; S E Kjeldsen; L H Lindholm; J O Syvertsen; J Lanke; U de Faire; B Dahlöf; B E Karlberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Quality-of-life questionnaire for patients taking antihypertensive medication.

Authors:  L M Nelsen; D U Himmelberger; A Morrison; M L Berger; L E Markson
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Effect of ramipril vs amlodipine on renal outcomes in hypertensive nephrosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L Y Agodoa; L Appel; G L Bakris; G Beck; J Bourgoignie; J P Briggs; J Charleston; D Cheek; W Cleveland; J G Douglas; M Douglas; D Dowie; M Faulkner; A Gabriel; J Gassman; T Greene; Y Hall; L Hebert; L Hiremath; K Jamerson; C J Johnson; J Kopple; J Kusek; J Lash; J Lea; J B Lewis; M Lipkowitz; S Massry; J Middleton; E R Miller; K Norris; D O'Connor; A Ojo; R A Phillips; V Pogue; M Rahman; O S Randall; S Rostand; G Schulman; W Smith; D Thornley-Brown; C C Tisher; R D Toto; J T Wright; S Xu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.

Authors:  Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Gareth Beevers; Ulf de Faire; Frej Fyhrquist; Hans Ibsen; Krister Kristiansson; Ole Lederballe-Pedersen; Lars H Lindholm; Markku S Nieminen; Per Omvik; Suzanne Oparil; Hans Wedel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Blood pressure variability: clinical implications and effects of antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  G Parati; A Ravogli; A Frattola; A Groppelli; L Ulian; C Santucciu; G Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1994-07

10.  Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: further evidence from the systolic hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial.

Authors:  J A Staessen; L Thijs; J Gasowski; H Cells; R H Fagard
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  7 in total

1.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Telmisartan and amlodipine single-pill combinations vs amlodipine monotherapy for superior blood pressure lowering and improved tolerability in patients with uncontrolled hypertension: results of the TEAMSTA-5 study.

Authors:  Steen Neldam; Margreet Lang; Russell Jones
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Losartan/Hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  Jin-Wook Chung; Hae-Young Lee; Cheol-Ho Kim; In-Whan Seung; Yung-Woo Shin; Myung-Ho Jeong; Myeong-Chan Cho; Byung-Hee Oh
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Aliskiren alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in Hispanic/Latino patients with systolic blood pressure 160 mm Hg to <180 mm Hg (Aliskiren Alone or in Combination with Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Stage 2 Hypertension to Provide Quick Intensive Control of Blood Pressure [ACQUIRE] substudy).

Authors:  Henry R Black; Fernando Aguirre P; Melanie Wright; Thomas Alessi; Fabio Baschiera
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Amlodipine and losartan: reaction to comparison.

Authors:  Gilbert Gleim; Ronald D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Epidemiology and management of hypertension in the Hispanic population: a review of the available literature.

Authors:  Nicolas J Guzman
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.571

7.  Functional vascular study in hypertensive subjects with type 2 diabetes using losartan or amlodipine.

Authors:  Cesar Romaro Pozzobon; Ronaldo A O C Gismondi; Ricardo Bedirian; Marcia Cristina Ladeira; Mario Fritsch Neves; Wille Oigman
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.000

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.