Literature DB >> 12555908

An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal.

Meeta R Patel1, Cathleen C Piazza, Cheryl J Martinez, Valerie M Volkert, M Santana Christine.   

Abstract

Consumption of solids and liquids occurs as a chain of behaviors that may include accepting, swallowing, and retaining the food or drink. In the current investigation, we evaluated the relative effectiveness of differential reinforcement of the first behavior in the chain (acceptance) versus differential reinforcement for the terminal behavior in the chain (mouth clean). Three children who had been diagnosed with a feeding disorder participated. Acceptance remained at zero when differential reinforcement contingencies were implemented for acceptance or mouth clean. Acceptance and mouth clean increased for all 3 participants once escape extinction was added to the differential reinforcement procedures, independent of whether reinforcement was provided for acceptance or for mouth clean. Maintenance was observed in 2 children when escape extinction was removed from the treatment package. The mechanism by which consumption increased is discussed in relation to positive and negative reinforcement contingencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12555908      PMCID: PMC1284399          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  11 in total

1.  Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.

Authors:  J S Lalli; T R Vollmer; P R Progar; C Wright; J Borrero; D Daniel; C H Barthold; K Tocco; W May
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

3.  Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; L P Hagopian; L G Bowman; L Toole
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

4.  The use of positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape-maintained destructive behavior.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; G P Hanley; M L Remick; S A Contrucci; T L Aitken
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

5.  Use of extinction and reinforcement to increase food consumption and reduce expulsion.

Authors:  D A Coe; R L Babbitt; K E Williams; C Hajimihalis; A M Snyder; C Ballard; L A Efron
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

6.  An alternating treatments comparison of two intensive interventions for food refusal.

Authors:  W H Ahearn; M L Kerwin; P S Eicher; J Shantz; W Swearingin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

7.  Use of component analyses to identify active variables in treatment packages for children with feeding disorders.

Authors:  L J Cooper; D P Wacker; J J McComas; K Brown; S M Peck; D Richman; J Drew; P Frischmeyer; T Millard
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

8.  Behavioral treatment of food refusal and selectivity in developmentally disabled children.

Authors:  M M Riordan; B A Iwata; M K Wohl; J W Finney
Journal:  Appl Res Ment Retard       Date:  1980

9.  Contingency contacting. Combining positive reinforcement and escape extinction procedures to treat persistent food refusal.

Authors:  T Hoch; R L Babbitt; D A Coe; D M Krell; L Hackbert
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  1994-01

10.  Treating chronic food refusal in young children: home-based parent training.

Authors:  M A Werle; T B Murphy; K S Budd
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993
View more
  22 in total

1.  Comparison of upright and flipped spoon presentations to guide treatment of food refusal.

Authors:  William G Sharp; Ashley Odom; David L Jaquess
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

2.  The use of an escape contingency and a token economy to increase food acceptance.

Authors:  SungWoo Kahng; James H Boscoe; Shannon Byrne
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  Increasing variety of foods consumed by blending nonpreferred foods into preferred foods.

Authors:  Michael M Mueller; Cathleen C Piazza; Meeta R Patel; Michael E Kelley; Angela Pruett
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

4.  Escape as reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of feeding problems.

Authors:  Robert H LaRue; Victoria Stewart; Cathleen C Piazza; Valerie M Volkert; Meeta R Patel; Jason Zeleny
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

Review 5.  Recent studies on feeding problems in children with autism.

Authors:  Valerie M Volkert; Petula C M Vaz
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010-03

6.  Descriptive analyses of pediatric food refusal and acceptance.

Authors:  Carrie S W Borrero; Julia N Woods; John C Borrero; Elizabeth A Masler; Aaron D Lesser
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010-03

7.  A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity.

Authors:  Jessica Weber; Anibal Gutierrez
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Functional assessment and behavioural intervention for eating difficulties in children with autism: a study conducted in the natural environment using parents and ABA tutors as therapists.

Authors:  Catherine M Gale; Svein Eikeseth; Eric Rudrud
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-10

9.  An evaluation of simultaneous presentation and differential reinforcement with response cost to reduce packing.

Authors:  Scott D Buckley; Debra K Newchok
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

10.  On the relative contributions of positive reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal.

Authors:  Cathleen C Piazza; Meeta R Patel; Charles S Gulotta; Bari M Sevin; Stacy A Layer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.