Literature DB >> 12555057

Use of willingness to pay to study values for pharmacotherapies for migraine headache.

Leslie A Lenert1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a wide range of therapeutic options for migraine headaches, yet little is known about how patients value different treatment alternatives nor how to tailor treatments to patients' preferences.
OBJECTIVE: Assess patients' preferences for outcomes of treatment of migraine headache based on their marginal willingness to pay (WTP) for treatment attributes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an Internet-based study, we used computer software to measure participants' WTP for a hypothetical ideal drug (one that was 100% effective, worked quickly, and had no adverse effects) and for other hypothetical drugs, each with one "less than ideal" attribute of performance.
SUBJECTS: Two hundred fifty-seven self-identified migraineurs recruited via an Internet Web site.
RESULTS: A high proportion of participants in the study had symptoms consistent with migraine etiology of headache (99%). Median "out-of-pocket" monthly WTP cost for an ideal migraine therapy was 130 dollars. WTP was associated with participants' own migraine experience: severity of pain, frequency of headaches, and the types of medications used in the past. WTP was reduced when pharmaceuticals offered less benefit, ranging from a mean of 74% of ideal for treatments that failed to relieve nausea, to 43% of ideal in treatments associated with a 50% chance of a rebound headache.
CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variability in patients' strength of preference for different attributes of migraine therapy. Choice of therapy for migraine headache should be individualized based on patients' preferences. WTP measures appear to be a valid and feasible metric for quantifying treatment preferences for migraine therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12555057     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000044909.63278.0D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

Review 1.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The importance of drug adverse effects compared with seizure control for people with epilepsy: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Andrew Lloyd; Emma McIntosh; Martin Price
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The "costs" of urinary incontinence for women.

Authors:  Leslee L Subak; Jeanette S Brown; Stephen R Kraus; Linda Brubaker; Feng Lin; Holly E Richter; Catherine S Bradley; Deborah Grady
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Parenteral dexamethasone for acute severe migraine headache: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for preventing recurrence.

Authors:  Ian Colman; Benjamin W Friedman; Michael D Brown; Grant D Innes; Eric Grafstein; Ted E Roberts; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-06-09

5.  High costs of urinary incontinence among women electing surgery to treat stress incontinence.

Authors:  Leslee L Subak; Linda Brubaker; Toby C Chai; Jennifer M Creasman; Ananias C Diokno; Patricia S Goode; Stephen R Kraus; John W Kusek; Wendy W Leng; Emily S Lukacz; Peggy Norton; Sharon Tennstedt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Acupuncture or low frequency infrared treatment for low back pain in Chinese patients: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Li-Chia Chen; Li-Jen Cheng; Yan Zhang; Xin He; Roger D Knaggs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Investigating Patients' Preferences to Inform Drug Development Decisions: Novel Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Migraine.

Authors:  Aleksandra Torbica; Carla Rognoni; Rosanna Tarricone
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.