Ady Oster1, Andrew B Bindman. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care Research Center, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, 94110, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether differences in disease prevalence, disease severity, or emergency department (ED) admission thresholds explain why black persons, Medicaid, and uninsured patients have higher hospitalization rates for ambulatory care sensitive (ACS) conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey was used to analyze the ED utilization, disease severity (assessed by triage category), hospitalization rates, and follow-up plans for adults with five chronic ACS conditions (asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension). The National Health Interview Survey was used to estimate the prevalence of these conditions in similarly aged US adults. RESULTS: Black persons, Medicaid, and uninsured patients make up a disproportionate share of ED visits for these chronic ACS conditions. Cumulative prevalence of these conditions was higher in black persons (33%) compared with white persons (27%) and Hispanic persons (22%), but did not differ among the payment groups. All race or payment groups were assigned to similar triage categories and similar percentages of their ED visits resulted in hospitalization. Black persons and Hispanic persons (odds ratios for both = 0.7), were less likely than white persons, whereas Medicaid and uninsured patients (odds ratios for both = 0.8), were less likely than private patients to have follow-up with the physician who referred them to the ED. CONCLUSIONS: The disproportionate ED utilization for chronic ACS conditions by black persons and Medicaid patients does not appear to be explained by either differences in disease prevalence or disease severity. Follow-up arrangements for black persons, Medicaid, and uninsured patients suggest that they are less likely to have ongoing primary care. Barriers to primary care appear to contribute to the higher ED and hospital utilization rates seen in these groups.
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether differences in disease prevalence, disease severity, or emergency department (ED) admission thresholds explain why black persons, Medicaid, and uninsured patients have higher hospitalization rates for ambulatory care sensitive (ACS) conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey was used to analyze the ED utilization, disease severity (assessed by triage category), hospitalization rates, and follow-up plans for adults with five chronic ACS conditions (asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension). The National Health Interview Survey was used to estimate the prevalence of these conditions in similarly aged US adults. RESULTS: Black persons, Medicaid, and uninsured patients make up a disproportionate share of ED visits for these chronic ACS conditions. Cumulative prevalence of these conditions was higher in black persons (33%) compared with white persons (27%) and Hispanic persons (22%), but did not differ among the payment groups. All race or payment groups were assigned to similar triage categories and similar percentages of their ED visits resulted in hospitalization. Black persons and Hispanic persons (odds ratios for both = 0.7), were less likely than white persons, whereas Medicaid and uninsured patients (odds ratios for both = 0.8), were less likely than private patients to have follow-up with the physician who referred them to the ED. CONCLUSIONS: The disproportionate ED utilization for chronic ACS conditions by black persons and Medicaid patients does not appear to be explained by either differences in disease prevalence or disease severity. Follow-up arrangements for black persons, Medicaid, and uninsured patients suggest that they are less likely to have ongoing primary care. Barriers to primary care appear to contribute to the higher ED and hospital utilization rates seen in these groups.
Authors: Keiko Asao; James Kaminski; Laura N McEwen; Xiejian Wu; Joyce M Lee; William H Herman Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Zachary M Grinspan; Jason S Shapiro; Erika L Abramson; Giles Hooker; Rainu Kaushal; Lisa M Kern Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sara Erickson; Irina Tolstykh; Joe V Selby; Guillermo Mendoza; Carlos Iribarren; Mark D Eisner Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Alexander S Young; Matthew J Chinman; Julie A Cradock-O'Leary; Greer Sullivan; Dennis Murata; Jim Mintz; Paul Koegel Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2005-04
Authors: George Rust; George E Fryer; Robert L Phillips; Elvan Daniels; Harry Strothers; David Satcher Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Zachary M Grinspan; Erika L Abramson; Samprit Banerjee; Lisa M Kern; Rainu Kaushal; Jason S Shapiro Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2013-11-16