Literature DB >> 12554995

Laparoscopy for adnexal masses in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Kevin J Stepp1, Paul K Tulikangas, Jeffrey M Goldberg, Marjan Attaran, Tommaso Falcone.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of laparoscopic treatment of adnexal masses in the second trimester of pregnancy.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3.
SETTING: Large tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: Eleven women. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic surgery.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All masses were identified by ultrasound. The average gestational age at the time of surgery was 17 weeks, 4 days. In seven women the primary cannula was inserted in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen. Procedures were eight ovarian cystectomies, two oophorectomies, and one exploratory laparoscopy. Average operating time was 135 minutes (range 95-195 min). Average time exposed to carbon dioxide was 78 minutes (range 59-135 min). None of the masses was malignant. There were no fetal complications or malformations. No patients had preterm labor and all delivered at term.
CONCLUSIONS: The increasing number of reported cases and our experience suggest that laparoscopic treatment of adnexal masses in the second trimester is safe and effective, but the surgeon must be skilled in advanced techniques of laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12554995     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60235-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc        ISSN: 1074-3804


  8 in total

1.  Outcome in laparoscopic management of persistent adnexal mass during the second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  P M Yuen; P S Ng; P L Leung; M S Rogers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy: this statement was reviewed and approved by the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), September 2007. It was prepared by the SAGES Guidelines Committee.

Authors:  Hori Yumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Heidi Jackson; Steven Granger; Raymond Price; Michael Rollins; David Earle; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jonathan Pearl; Raymond Price; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of pelvic masses in pregnant patients: a series of four cases and literature review.

Authors:  Alberto A Mendivil; John V Brown; Lisa N Abaid; Mark A Rettenmaier; John P Micha; Marie A Wabe; Bram H Goldstein
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-01-18

6.  Surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy.

Authors:  Siew-Fei Ngu; Vincent Y T Cheung; Ting-Chung Pun
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Effect of Two-Port Laparoscopic Surgery on Pregnancy Outcomes of Patients with Concurrent Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Ying-Xuan Li; Mu-En Ko; Ching Hsu; Kuan-Ju Huang; Bor-Ching Sheu; Wen-Chun Chang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  [Torsion of uterine appendages during pregnancy: report of a case at Yaoundé Central Hospital, Cameroon].

Authors:  Jeanne Hortence Fouedjio; Jovanny Tsuala Fouogue; Florent Ymele Fouelifack; Charlette Nangue; Zacharie Sando; Robinson Enow Mbu
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2014-01-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.