Literature DB >> 12553536

Application of in vivo electroporation to cancer gene therapy.

Takahiko Tamura1, Tsuneaki Sakata.   

Abstract

Much intensive research has gone into the development of safe and efficient methods for the delivery of therapeutic genes. In vivo electroporation is a non-viral delivery protocol in which plasmid DNA solutions are injected into targeted tissues, followed by electric pulses (typically 100 V, 50 ms). In general, in vivo electroporation enhances gene expression in targeted tissues by 2-3 orders of magnitude, as compared to the injection of plasmid DNA solutions without electric pulses, and the tissue damage appears to be minimal. Among the other advantages of this technique are that it can safely be administered repeatedly, and it is simpler and more economical to use than viral vectors, especially in clinical cases. Using this approach, highly efficient gene transfer has already been achieved in muscle and liver as well as in tumors. In fact, gene therapies for cancer utilizing in vivo electroporation have been proved effective in a number of experimental murine tumor models. The therapeutic genes delivered in those cases were diverse including, for example, cytokine genes (IL-12) and cytotoxic genes (TRAIL), making possible a wide range of therapeutic strategies. Moreover, systemic antitumor effects were also observed, suggesting that this approach may be effective for the treatment of metastatic as well as primary tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12553536     DOI: 10.2174/1566523033347462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gene Ther        ISSN: 1566-5232            Impact factor:   4.391


  7 in total

1.  Targeting tumor suppressor networks for cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Xuning Emily Guo; Bryan Ngo; Aram Sandaldjian Modrek; Wen-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.465

2.  In vivo electroporation of minicircle DNA as a novel method of vaccine delivery to enhance HIV-1-specific immune responses.

Authors:  Qingtao Wang; Wei Jiang; Yuhai Chen; Pengyu Liu; Chunjie Sheng; Shuai Chen; Hui Zhang; Changchuan Pan; Shijuan Gao; Wenlin Huang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Intrinsic bio-signature of gene delivery nanocarriers may impair gene therapy goals.

Authors:  Jaleh Barar; Yadollah Omidi
Journal:  Bioimpacts       Date:  2013-09-17

Review 4.  [Perspectives of genome editing in otorhinolaryngology].

Authors:  F Oppel; M Schürmann; S Shao; B Kaltschmidt; C Kaltschmidt; H Sudhoff
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Irreversible electroporation facilitates gene transfer of a GM-CSF plasmid with a local and systemic response.

Authors:  Joyce T Au; Arjun Mittra; Tae Jin Song; Michael Cavnar; Kyonghwa Jun; Joshua Carson; Sepideh Gholami; Dana Haddad; Sebastien Gaujoux; Sebastien Monette; Paula Ezell; Jedd Wolchok; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Enhancement of electric field-mediated gene delivery through pretreatment of tumors with a hyperosmotic mannitol solution.

Authors:  J Henshaw; B Mossop; F Yuan
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 5.987

7.  Immunologic responses to xenogeneic tyrosinase DNA vaccine administered by electroporation in patients with malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Jianda Yuan; Geoffrey Y Ku; Matthew Adamow; Zhenyu Mu; Sapna Tandon; Drew Hannaman; Paul Chapman; Gary Schwartz; Richard Carvajal; Katherine S Panageas; Alan N Houghton; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 13.751

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.