OBJECTIVE: To analyse whether blips are associated with a higher risk of virological or immunological failure than persistent undetectable viraemia (UND) among HIV-infected patients receiving HAART. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients with blips or UND were selected from a prospective cohort of 330 patients under HAART for over 48 weeks. Blips were defined as detectable viraemia up to a maximum of 1000 copies/ml preceded by two consecutive visits and followed by one visit showing undetectable viraemia. Patients were included according to the following criteria: i) Blip group: patients that showed transient relapses of viraemia; ii) UND group: patients who had achieved UND on HAART before 24 weeks of therapy and that sustained viral suppression for four consecutive visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Virological and immunological failure. RESULTS: Thirty seven (11%) and 65 (20%) patients showed blips and persistent UND, respectively. Virological failure was observed in three (8.1%) patients in the blip group and 11 (16.9%) patients in the UND group (P=0.25). The time to virological failure was shorter in the UND group (P=0.12). The rates of virological failure and the time to virological failure were similar between both groups after excluding patients with compliance <95%. The time to immunological failure was also similar in both groups (P=0.5). In a Cox model, only the use of saquinavir hard gel-based regimens was independently associated with the time to virological and immunological failure. CONCLUSION: Patients under HAART with transient low-level viraemia are not at an increased risk of developing virological or immunological failure.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse whether blips are associated with a higher risk of virological or immunological failure than persistent undetectable viraemia (UND) among HIV-infected patients receiving HAART. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients with blips or UND were selected from a prospective cohort of 330 patients under HAART for over 48 weeks. Blips were defined as detectable viraemia up to a maximum of 1000 copies/ml preceded by two consecutive visits and followed by one visit showing undetectable viraemia. Patients were included according to the following criteria: i) Blip group: patients that showed transient relapses of viraemia; ii) UND group: patients who had achieved UND on HAART before 24 weeks of therapy and that sustained viral suppression for four consecutive visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Virological and immunological failure. RESULTS: Thirty seven (11%) and 65 (20%) patients showed blips and persistent UND, respectively. Virological failure was observed in three (8.1%) patients in the blip group and 11 (16.9%) patients in the UND group (P=0.25). The time to virological failure was shorter in the UND group (P=0.12). The rates of virological failure and the time to virological failure were similar between both groups after excluding patients with compliance <95%. The time to immunological failure was also similar in both groups (P=0.5). In a Cox model, only the use of saquinavir hard gel-based regimens was independently associated with the time to virological and immunological failure. CONCLUSION: Patients under HAART with transient low-level viraemia are not at an increased risk of developing virological or immunological failure.
Authors: J Troy Grennan; Mona R Loutfy; DeSheng Su; P Richard Harrigan; Curtis Cooper; Marina Klein; Nima Machouf; Julio S G Montaner; Sean Rourke; Christos Tsoukas; Bob Hogg; Janet Raboud Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-04-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jamison Norwood; Megan Turner; Carmen Bofill; Peter Rebeiro; Bryan Shepherd; Sally Bebawy; Todd Hulgan; Stephen Raffanti; David W Haas; Timothy R Sterling; John R Koethe Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: A Gonzalez-Serna; J E Min; C Woods; D Chan; V D Lima; J S G Montaner; P R Harrigan; L C Swenson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-01-14 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Pedro Castro; Montserrat Plana; Raquel González; Anna López; Anna Vilella; Jose M Nicolas; Teresa Gallart; Tomàs Pumarola; José M Bayas; José M Gatell; Felipe García Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-12-16 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Patrick Ryscavage; Sean Kelly; Jonathan Z Li; P Richard Harrigan; Babafemi Taiwo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: C Thomas Nugent; Vladislav Nodelman; Cristina Giachetti; Douglas D Richman; David J Looney Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Emmanouil Papasavvas; Jay R Kostman; Brian Thiel; Maxwell Pistilli; Agnieszka Mackiewicz; Andrea Foulkes; Robert Gross; Kimberly A Jordan; Douglas F Nixon; Robert Grant; Jean-Francois Poulin; Joseph M McCune; Karam Mounzer; Luis J Montaner Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 8.542
Authors: Anne Marie Kerchberger; Anandi N Sheth; Christine D Angert; C Christina Mehta; Nathan A Summers; Ighovwerha Ofotokun; Deborah Gustafson; Sheri D Weiser; Anjali Sharma; Adaora A Adimora; Audrey L French; Michael Augenbraun; Jennifer Cocohoba; Seble Kassaye; Hector Bolivar; Usha Govindarajulu; Deborah Konkle-Parker; Elizabeth T Golub; Cecile D Lahiri Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 9.079