Baerbel Rohrer1, Judith Mosinger Ogilvie. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. rohrer@musc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the effects of trkB deficiency in the mouse retina on photoreceptor development and retinal organization, in the absence of confounding systemic effects. METHODS: Newborn mice that carried two null trkB alleles (trkB-/-) and their wild type (WT) littermates were used for retinal organ cultures. On Day 21, rod development was assessed histologically in plastic sections (outer segment length) and retinal organization was analyzed using retinal cell-type specific antibodies. Anatomical data obtained from the organ cultures were compared to previously published histological results from in vivo data. RESULTS: (1) Rod outer segment length was significantly shorter in retinas from trkB-/- mice in the presence of normal numbers of rods. (2) No dopaminergic amacrine cells were observed in the knockout retina. (3) Unlike in the in vivo condition, recoverin-positive OFF-cone bipolar cells were present in trkB-/- retinas grown in culture. CONCLUSIONS: (1) These results demonstrate that rod outer segment development is compromised in the absence of trkB in the retina. (2) This study further supports our previous conclusion that the elimination of trkB expression alters rod development, because the presence of trkB receptors within the retina is essential for normal rod maturation and not because of confounding systemic effects. (3) More generally, this study stresses the importance of investigating complex phenotypes in gene knockout mice under conditions that isolate the organ under investigation from unrelated systemic variations.
PURPOSE: To determine the effects of trkB deficiency in the mouse retina on photoreceptor development and retinal organization, in the absence of confounding systemic effects. METHODS: Newborn mice that carried two null trkB alleles (trkB-/-) and their wild type (WT) littermates were used for retinal organ cultures. On Day 21, rod development was assessed histologically in plastic sections (outer segment length) and retinal organization was analyzed using retinal cell-type specific antibodies. Anatomical data obtained from the organ cultures were compared to previously published histological results from in vivo data. RESULTS: (1) Rod outer segment length was significantly shorter in retinas from trkB-/- mice in the presence of normal numbers of rods. (2) No dopaminergic amacrine cells were observed in the knockout retina. (3) Unlike in the in vivo condition, recoverin-positive OFF-cone bipolar cells were present in trkB-/- retinas grown in culture. CONCLUSIONS: (1) These results demonstrate that rod outer segment development is compromised in the absence of trkB in the retina. (2) This study further supports our previous conclusion that the elimination of trkB expression alters rod development, because the presence of trkB receptors within the retina is essential for normal rod maturation and not because of confounding systemic effects. (3) More generally, this study stresses the importance of investigating complex phenotypes in gene knockout mice under conditions that isolate the organ under investigation from unrelated systemic variations.
Authors: A Germanà; C Sánchez-Ramos; M C Guerrera; M G Calavia; M Navarro; R Zichichi; O García-Suárez; P Pérez-Piñera; Jose A Vega Journal: J Anat Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: Ruslan N Grishanin; Haidong Yang; Xiaorong Liu; Kate Donohue-Rolfe; George C Nune; Keling Zang; Baoji Xu; Jacque L Duncan; Matthew M Lavail; David R Copenhagen; Louis F Reichardt Journal: Mol Cell Neurosci Date: 2008-04-22 Impact factor: 4.314
Authors: Eric C Lawson; Moon K Han; Jana T Sellers; Micah A Chrenek; Adam Hanif; Marissa A Gogniat; Jeffrey H Boatright; Machelle T Pardue Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Baerbel Rohrer; Roman Blanco; Robert E Marc; Marcia B Lloyd; Dean Bok; David M Schneeweis; Louis F Reichardt Journal: Vis Neurosci Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: Brian A Turner; Janet Sparrow; Bolin Cai; Julie Monroe; Takashi Mikawa; Barbara L Hempstead Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2006-08-14 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Craig Beeson; Yuri K Peterson; Nathan Perron; Mausumi Bandyopadhyay; Cecile Nasarre; Gyda Beeson; Richard F Comer; Christopher C Lindsey; Rick G Schnellmann; Bärbel Rohrer Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 2.850
Authors: Judith Mosinger Ogilvie; Angela M Hakenewerth; Rachel R Gardner; Joshua G Martak; Virginia M Maggio Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2009-12-23 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Liyun Zhang; Conan Chen; Jie Fu; Brendan Lilley; Cynthia Berlinicke; Baranda Hansen; Ding Ding; Guohua Wang; Tao Wang; Daniel Shou; Ying Ye; Timothy Mulligan; Kevin Emmerich; Meera T Saxena; Kelsi R Hall; Abigail V Sharrock; Carlene Brandon; Hyejin Park; Tae-In Kam; Valina L Dawson; Ted M Dawson; Joong Sup Shim; Justin Hanes; Hongkai Ji; Jun O Liu; Jiang Qian; David F Ackerley; Baerbel Rohrer; Donald J Zack; Jeff S Mumm Journal: Elife Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 8.140