Literature DB >> 12550813

A clinically applicable EMG-force model to quantify active stabilization of the knee after a lesion of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Caroline A M Doorenbosch1, Jaap Harlaar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a simple electromyography-force (EMG-force) model can be used to measure different levels of co-contraction about the knee for healthy subjects and patients with an anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.
DESIGN: To evaluate an EMG-to-force processing model, two groups of subjects, with and without deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament, participated in experiments in which surface EMG, kinematics and kinetics about the knee were recorded during isokinetic and functional movements.
BACKGROUND: Clinical and biomechanical evidence supports the hypothesis that higher level of co-contraction of quadriceps and hamstrings provide an active stabilization of the knee to compensate for the lost anterior cruciate ligament. To quantify the level of co-contraction, the contribution of both agonist and antagonist muscles to the net joint moment must be known.
METHODS: Surface EMG levels were calibrated to moment by means of a limited number of isokinetic contractions about the knee. With these calibration values, an estimate of the muscle moments during a vertical jump were obtained and compared with the net joint moment, calculated with inverse dynamics. Also co-contraction indices were determined.
RESULTS: The EMG-force model provided a fair estimate of the net joint moment. The co-contraction index in anterior cruciate ligament deficient subjects was significantly higher (mean 0.54 (SD, 0.04)) compared to healthy subjects (mean 0.25 (SD, 0.07)).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the EMG-to-force processing model is not perfectly accurate, it is appropriate within a clinical context. RELEVANCE: Previous research supports the hypothesis that subjects with an anterior cruciate ligament deficiency compensate the loss of passive stability by developing higher co-activation levels of the knee muscles, i.e. active stabilization. Quantifying co-contraction may serve as a valuable parameter to evaluate clinical interventions and rehabilitation processes. The EMG-force model presented in this study appears to be a useful instrument for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12550813     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00183-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  11 in total

1.  Error associated with antagonist muscle activity in isometric knee strength testing.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Neural adaptations to resistive exercise: mechanisms and recommendations for training practices.

Authors:  David A Gabriel; Gary Kamen; Gail Frost
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Co-contraction in RA patients with a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis during a step-up task.

Authors:  Eric H Garling; Nienke Wolterbeek; Sanne Velzeboer; Rob G H H Nelissen; Edward R Valstar; Caroline A M Doorenbosch; Jaap Harlaar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  EMG Analysis of Lower Extremity Muscles in Three Different Squat Exercises.

Authors:  Gaston Ariel Nishiwaki; Yukio Urabe; Kosuke Tanaka
Journal:  J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc       Date:  2006

5.  A practical strategy for sEMG-based knee joint moment estimation during gait and its validation in individuals with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Suncheol Kwon; Hyung-Soon Park; Christopher J Stanley; Jung Kim; Jonghyun Kim; Diane L Damiano
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Design of Optimal Treatments for Neuromusculoskeletal Disorders using Patient-Specific Multibody Dynamic Models.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Int J Comput Vis Biomech       Date:  2009-07-01

7.  Two degrees of freedom, dynamic, hand-wrist EMG-force using a minimum number of electrodes.

Authors:  Chenyun Dai; Ziling Zhu; Carlos Martinez-Luna; Thane R Hunt; Todd R Farrell; Edward A Clancy
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Quantification of functional knee flexor to extensor moment ratio using isokinetics and electromyography.

Authors:  Eleftherios Kellis; Athanasios Katis
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Lower extremity EMG-driven modeling of walking with automated adjustment of musculoskeletal geometry.

Authors:  Andrew J Meyer; Carolynn Patten; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The center of pressure and ankle muscle co-contraction in response to anterior-posterior perturbations.

Authors:  Dongwon Kim; Jong-Moon Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.