Literature DB >> 12549653

Comparison of nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring and cavernosal smooth muscle content in patients with erectile dysfunction.

Erdal Yilmaz1, Onder Yaman, Murat Bozlu, Tansel Inal, Zafer Tokatli, Kadri Anafarta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring was compared to cavernosal smooth muscle content in 48 cases of erectile dysfunction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-operatively nocturnal penile tumescence rigidity (NPTR) testing, colour Doppler sonography and if needed pharmaco cavernosometry-cavernosography were evaluated in 48 impotent patients before surgical intervention. The 40 patients whom all those diagnostic tools were abnormal constituted the first group. In the remaining 8 patients, which constitutes the second group, NPTR testing were normal but the other tests were abnormal. 10 potent patients with congenital penile curvature constituted the third group. Cavernous biopsies were obtained during the surgery and biopsies stained immunohistochemically to quantify smooth muscle cells (SMC) by anti-desmin and anti-SMA.
RESULTS: We observed statistical significant difference of corporeal SMC content with regard to first Vs second group and first Vs third group (p < 0.05). However we did not observe statistically significant difference with regard to second vs third group (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: NPTR testing appears to correlate well with corporeal SMC, which is the key structures of erection. We think that with taking into the consideration of its specific reservations, NPTR testing is still one of the best non-invasive tool in the differential diagnosis of erectile dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12549653     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021327500439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  18 in total

1.  Nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring in young potent volunteers: reproducibility, evaluation criteria and the effect of sexual intercourse.

Authors:  D G Hatzichristou; K Hatzimouratidis; E Ioannides; K Yannakoyorgos; G Dimitriadis; A Kalinderis
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Physiology of erection and pharmacological management of impotence.

Authors:  T F Lue; E A Tanagho
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  False diagnoses of venous leak impotence.

Authors:  D K Montague; M M Lakin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and nocturnal penile tumescence in evaluation of impotence.

Authors:  R P Allen; R M Engel; J K Smolev; C B Brendler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  New method for continuous measurement of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity.

Authors:  W E Bradley; G W Timm; J M Gallagher; B K Johnson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Objective criteria in the long-term evaluation of penile venous surgery.

Authors:  E Wespes; P Moreira de Goes; A A Sattar; C Schulman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Erectile dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H J Kirkeby; E U Poulsen; T Petersen; J Dørup
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Prognostic factors for the postoperative outcome of penile venous surgery for venogenic erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  C G Stief; M Djamilian; M C Truss; H Tan; W F Thon; U Jonas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Computerized analysis of smooth muscle fibers in potent and impotent patients.

Authors:  E Wespes; P M Goes; S Schiffmann; M Depierreux; J J Vanderhaeghen; C C Schulman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Controlled trial of infusion cavernosometry in impotent and potent men.

Authors:  M A Lowe; A N Schwartz; R E Berger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.