Literature DB >> 12549549

Arsenic distribution in Florida urban soils: comparison between Gainesville and Miami.

T Chirenje1, L Q Ma, M Szulczewski, R Littell, K M Portier, E Zillioux.   

Abstract

Arsenic contamination is of concern due to its effect as a carcinogen. Understanding the distribution of arsenic in urban soils is important for establishing baseline concentrations from which anthropogenic effects can be measured. The soil cleanup target level (SCTL) for arsenic in Florida (0.8 and 3.7 mg kg(-1) in residential and commercial areas, respectively) is lower than in most states and is near the arsenic background concentrations in Florida soils. The objective of this study was to characterize the distribution of arsenic in the soils of two Florida cities, Gainesville and Miami. More than 200 soil samples were collected from three land-use classes in each city (residential, commercial, and public land), digested with USEPA Method 3051a, and analyzed with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Arsenic concentrations varied greatly in Gainesville, ranging from 0.21 to approximately 660 mg kg(-1) with a geometric mean (GM) of 0.40 mg kg(-1) (after discarding outliers), which was significantly lower than the GM of 2.81 mg kg(-1) in Miami, although Miami samples ranged only from 0.32 to approximately 110 mg kg(-1). Arsenic concentrations in 29 and 4% of the Gainesville soil samples and 95 and 33% of the Miami samples exceeded the Florida residential and commercial SCTL, respectively. This study is the first to provide information on arsenic distribution in urban soils of Florida, and the data are useful for assessing arsenic contamination and determining the need for remediation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12549549     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.1090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  4 in total

1.  Geochemistry in the modern soil survey program.

Authors:  M A Wilson; R Burt; S J Indorante; A B Jenkins; J V Chiaretti; M G Ulmer; J M Scheyer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Comparison of methods used to calculate typical threshold values for potentially toxic elements in soil.

Authors:  Rebekka McIlwaine; Siobhan F Cox; Rory Doherty; Sherry Palmer; Ulrich Ofterdinger; Jennifer M McKinley
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Accumulation of iron and arsenic in the Chandina alluvium of the lower delta plain, Southeastern Bangladesh.

Authors:  Anwar Zahid; M Q Hassan; G N Breit; K-D Balke; Matthias Flegr
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 4.  Natural Background and Anthropogenic Arsenic Enrichment in Florida Soils, Surface Water, and Groundwater: A Review with a Discussion on Public Health Risk.

Authors:  Thomas M Missimer; Christopher M Teaf; William T Beeson; Robert G Maliva; John Woolschlager; Douglas J Covert
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.