Literature DB >> 12548543

A comparison of parthenogenetic and sexual embryogenesis of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea).

Toru Miura1, Christian Braendle, Alexander Shingleton, Geoffroy Sisk, Srinivas Kambhampati, David L Stern.   

Abstract

Aphids exhibit divergent modes of embryogenesis during the sexual and asexual phases of the life cycle. To explore how a single genome can give rise to these alternative developmental modes, we have initiated embryological studies of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Here we present a detailed description of parthenogenetic, viviparous embryonic development in the pea aphid. We compare and contrast development of the parthenogenetic embryo with that of the embryo resulting from sexual reproduction. The primary difference between the embryos is the scale on which development occurs: early parthenogenetic development occurs in a volume approximately three orders of magnitude smaller than the sexual egg, largely because of the apparent absence of yolk in the parthenogenetic egg. This results in a drastically different duration of syncytial energid cleavage and, presumably, patterning processes in the two embryos must act at scales that differ by orders of magnitude. The eggs also develop on time scales that differ approximately by an order of magnitude and the timing of the embryonic movements, collectively called blastokinesis, have temporally shifted relative to growth of the embryo. In addition, the endosymbiotic bacteria are transferred from mother to embryo in different ways in the two embryos. Finally, the function of the serosa has diverged greatly in the two embryos: in the sexual egg the serosa deposits a thick cuticle that protects the egg, whereas the serosa of the parthenogenetic embryo is greatly reduced and its function is unclear. The pea aphid is a useful model system for examining how a single genome has evolved to allow divergent modes of development. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12548543     DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol        ISSN: 1552-5007            Impact factor:   2.656


  81 in total

1.  Alternative morphs and plasticity of vulval development in a rhabditid nematode species.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Evolution of a genomic regulatory domain: the role of gene co-option and gene duplication in the Enhancer of split complex.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Duncan; Peter K Dearden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Insect endosymbionts: manipulators of insect herbivore trophic interactions?

Authors:  Emily L Clark; Alison J Karley; Stephen F Hubbard
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  An ancient but promiscuous host-symbiont association between Burkholderia gut symbionts and their heteropteran hosts.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Kikuchi; Takahiro Hosokawa; Takema Fukatsu
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Symbiont acquisition alters behaviour of stinkbug nymphs.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosokawa; Yoshitomo Kikuchi; Masakazu Shimada; Takema Fukatsu
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Profiling the repertoire of phenotypes influenced by environmental cues that occur during asexual reproduction.

Authors:  Aviv Dombrovsky; Laury Arthaud; Terence N Ledger; Sophie Tares; Alain Robichon
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Evolution of symbiotic organs and endosymbionts in lygaeid stinkbugs.

Authors:  Yu Matsuura; Yoshitomo Kikuchi; Takahiro Hosokawa; Ryuichi Koga; Xian-Ying Meng; Yoichi Kamagata; Naruo Nikoh; Takema Fukatsu
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  Extensive Differential Splicing Underlies Phenotypically Plastic Aphid Morphs.

Authors:  Mary E Grantham; Jennifer A Brisson
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Intrinsic pre-zygotic reproductive isolation of distantly related pea aphid host races.

Authors:  Varvara Fazalova; Bruno Nevado; Ailsa McLean; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Impact of host developmental age on the transcriptome of the symbiotic bacterium Buchnera aphidicola in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum).

Authors:  John Bermingham; Andréane Rabatel; Federica Calevro; José Viñuelas; Gérard Febvay; Hubert Charles; Angela Douglas; Tom Wilkinson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.