Literature DB >> 12548251

Incidence of urinary tract infections in patients with short-term indwelling urethral catheters: a comparison between a 3-day urinary drainage bag change and no change regimens.

Anuwat Keerasuntonpong1, Wannasit Thearawiboon, Anchalee Panthawanan, Thepnimitr Judaeng, Kanjana Kachintorn, Duangporn Jintanotaitavorn, Luckana Suddhisanont, Sribenja Waitayapiches, Surapee Tiangrim, Visanu Thamlikitkul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current practice of caring for hospitalized patients with indwelling urethral catheters in Siriraj Hospital is to change the drainage bag every 3 days. In an extensive medical literature search, no evidence was noted to support this practice.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (UTI) in hospitalized patients with indwelling catheters who receive a drainage bag change every 3 days with the incidence of UTI in patients who receive no bag change.
DESIGN: This study was a randomized controlled trial. Participants and study procedures: Of the patients at Siriraj Hospital, 153 with an indwelling urinary catheter for at least 3 days were randomized to a 3-day drainage bag change or a no change regimen. A urine sample was obtained from each patient for culture every 7 days, on the day the catheter was removed, or the day the patient was suspected of having a UTI.
RESULTS: Of the 153 study patients, 79 were randomized to the 3-day bag change regimen, and 74 patients were in the no-change group. Both groups were comparable for all baseline characteristics. The incidence of symptomatic UTI was 13.9% in the 3-day drainage bag change group and 10.8% in the no change group (P =.7). The incidence of asymptomatic UTI was 36.7% in the 3-day bag change group and 36.5% in the no change group (P =.9).
CONCLUSION: There is no evidence for the necessity of a bag change every 3 days at Siriraj Hospital; the urine bag can be left longer than 3 days. However, the appropriate frequency of urinary drainage bag change needs additional study because the sample size in this study does not rule out a false-negative result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12548251     DOI: 10.1067/mic.2003.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  3 in total

1.  epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.

Authors:  H P Loveday; J A Wilson; R J Pratt; M Golsorkhi; A Tingle; A Bak; J Browne; J Prieto; M Wilcox
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  epic2: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.

Authors:  R J Pratt; C M Pellowe; J A Wilson; H P Loveday; P J Harper; S R L J Jones; C McDougall; M H Wilcox
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Update on voiding dysfunction managed with suprapubic catheterization.

Authors:  Sharon F English
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.