OBJECTIVE: Infection with oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPVs) is the most important cause of cervical cancer worldwide. After infection there is a long latency period of at least 10 to 15 years during which cervical cancer develops in a small proportion of originally infected women. Up to 50% of these women have at diagnosis antibodies to the HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7, which are rarely found among healthy women. Our purpose was to evaluate whether antibodies to HPV16 and HPV18 E6 and E7 proteins are useful for early diagnosis of cervical cancer by measuring the antibody response in women in whom cervical cancer later developed. STUDY DESIGN: A joint serum bank of 550,000 Swedish, Norwegian, and Finnish women was followed up for 0.5 to 20 years, after which 178 invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC) cases, 150 of whom had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 527 controls were identified. Antibodies to HPV16 and HPV18 E6 and E7 proteins were determined by tag enzyme-linked immunoassays. RESULTS: HPV16/18 E6 and E7 antibodies were detected infrequently (7.0%) in women in whom SCC later developed and yielded a moderately increased estimate of associated relative risk (odds ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.4). Sensitivity of the combined antibody tests for the detection of occult SCC varied between 6% and 14% but was not related to time lag between serum sampling and cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: HPV16/18 E6 and E7 antibody responses are not sensitive markers of occult cervical cancer.
OBJECTIVE: Infection with oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPVs) is the most important cause of cervical cancer worldwide. After infection there is a long latency period of at least 10 to 15 years during which cervical cancer develops in a small proportion of originally infected women. Up to 50% of these women have at diagnosis antibodies to the HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7, which are rarely found among healthy women. Our purpose was to evaluate whether antibodies to HPV16 and HPV18 E6 and E7 proteins are useful for early diagnosis of cervical cancer by measuring the antibody response in women in whom cervical cancer later developed. STUDY DESIGN: A joint serum bank of 550,000 Swedish, Norwegian, and Finnish women was followed up for 0.5 to 20 years, after which 178 invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC) cases, 150 of whom had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 527 controls were identified. Antibodies to HPV16 and HPV18 E6 and E7 proteins were determined by tag enzyme-linked immunoassays. RESULTS:HPV16/18 E6 and E7 antibodies were detected infrequently (7.0%) in women in whom SCC later developed and yielded a moderately increased estimate of associated relative risk (odds ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.4). Sensitivity of the combined antibody tests for the detection of occult SCC varied between 6% and 14% but was not related to time lag between serum sampling and cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION:HPV16/18 E6 and E7 antibody responses are not sensitive markers of occult cervical cancer.
Authors: Daniel C Beachler; Raphael Viscidi; Elizabeth A Sugar; Howard Minkoff; Howard D Strickler; Ross D Cranston; Dorothy J Wiley; Lisa P Jacobson; Kathleen M Weber; Joseph B Margolick; Susheel Reddy; Maura L Gillison; Gypsyamber D'Souza Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Linda M Rubenstein; Elaine M Smith; Michael Pawlita; Thomas H Haugen; Eva Hamšíková; Lubomir P Turek Journal: Infect Agent Cancer Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 2.965
Authors: Rafael Jimenez-Flores; Rene Mendez-Cruz; Jorge Ojeda-Ortiz; Rebeca Muñoz-Molina; Oscar Balderas-Carrillo; Maria de la Luz Diaz-Soberanes; Serge Lebecque; Sem Saeland; Adrian Daneri-Navarro; Alejandro Garcia-Carranca; Stephen E Ullrich; Leopoldo Flores-Romo Journal: Immunology Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.397
Authors: Martha Luevano; Hans-Ulrich Bernard; Hugo A Barrera-Saldaña; Victor Trevino; Alejandro Garcia-Carranca; Luisa L Villa; Bradley J Monk; Xiaolin Tan; D Huw Davies; Phil L Felgner; Mina Kalantari Journal: Virology Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Till Piontek; Christoph Harmel; Michael Pawlita; Katrin Carow; Juliane Schröter; Ingo B Runnebaum; Matthias Dürst; Frederik Graw; Tim Waterboer Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Sanjana Balachandra; Samuel B Kusin; Rebecca Lee; James-Michael Blackwell; Jasmin A Tiro; Lindsay G Cowell; Cheng-Ming Chiang; Shwu-Yuan Wu; Sanskriti Varma; Erika L Rivera; Helen G Mayo; Lianghao Ding; Baran D Sumer; Jayanthi S Lea; Aditya Bagrodia; Linda M Farkas; Richard Wang; Carole Fakhry; Kristina R Dahlstrom; Erich M Sturgis; Andrew T Day Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Aimée R Kreimer; Mattias Johansson; Tim Waterboer; Rudolf Kaaks; Jenny Chang-Claude; Dagmar Drogen; Anne Tjønneland; Kim Overvad; J Ramón Quirós; Carlos A González; Maria José Sánchez; Nerea Larrañaga; Carmen Navarro; Aurelio Barricarte; Ruth C Travis; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nick Wareham; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Petra H M Peeters; Salvatore Panico; Giovanna Masala; Sara Grioni; Rosario Tumino; Paolo Vineis; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Göran Laurell; Göran Hallmans; Jonas Manjer; Johanna Ekström; Guri Skeie; Eiliv Lund; Elisabete Weiderpass; Pietro Ferrari; Graham Byrnes; Isabelle Romieu; Elio Riboli; Allan Hildesheim; Heiner Boeing; Michael Pawlita; Paul Brennan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-06-17 Impact factor: 44.544