Literature DB >> 12547844

Activation among the elbow flexor muscles differs when maintaining arm position during a fatiguing contraction.

Sandra K Hunter1, Romuald Lepers, Carol J MacGillis, Roger M Enoka.   

Abstract

Twenty-four men (n = 11) and women (n = 13) supported an inertial load equivalent to 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction force with the elbow flexor muscles for as long as possible while maintaining a constant elbow angle at 90 degrees. Endurance time did not differ on the three occasions that the task was performed (320 +/- 149 s; P > 0.05), and there was no difference between women (360 +/- 168 s) and men (273 +/- 108 s; P = 0.11). The rate of increase in average electromyogram (EMG) for the elbow flexor muscles was similar across sessions (P > 0.05). However, average EMG during the fatiguing task increased for the long head of biceps brachii, brachioradialis, and brachialis (P < 0.05) but not for the short head of biceps brachii. Furthermore, the average EMG for the brachialis was greater at the start and end of the contraction compared with the other elbow flexor muscles. The rate of bursts in EMG activity increased during the fatiguing contraction and was greater in brachialis (1.0 +/- 0.2 bursts/min) compared with the other elbow flexor muscles (0.5 +/- 0.1 bursts/min). The changes in the standard deviation of acceleration, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate during the fatiguing contractions were similar across sessions. These findings indicate that the EMG activity, which reflects the net excitatory and inhibitory input received by the motoneurons in the spinal cord, was not adaptable over repeat sessions for the maintain-position task. Furthermore, these results contrast those from a previous study (Hunter SK and Enoka RM. J Appl Physiol 94: 108-118, 2003) when the goal of the isometric contraction was to maintain a constant force. These results, from a series of studies on the elbow flexor muscles, indicate that the type of load supported during the fatiguing contraction influences the extent to which endurance time can change with repeat performances of the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12547844     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01038.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  29 in total

1.  Variation of force amplitude and its effects on local fatigue.

Authors:  Marcus Yung; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Richard P Wells
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Decline in voluntary activation contributes to reduced maximal performance of fatigued human lower limb muscles.

Authors:  K N Mileva; D P Sumners; J L Bowtell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Synergists activation pattern of the quadriceps muscle differs when performing sustained isometric contractions with different EMG biofeedback.

Authors:  Nicolas Place; Boris Matkowski; Alain Martin; Romuald Lepers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Weight-bearing exercise accuracy influences muscle activation strategies of the knee.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  The role of cocontraction in the impairment of movement accuracy with fatigue.

Authors:  Olivier Missenard; Denis Mottet; Stephane Perrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Can the electromyographic fatigue threshold be determined from superficial elbow flexor muscles during an isometric single-joint task?

Authors:  François Hug; Antoine Nordez; Arnaud Guével
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Physiological changes underlying bilateral isometric arm voluntary contractions in healthy humans.

Authors:  Demetris S Soteropoulos; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Time to task failure varies with the gain of the feedback signal for women, but not for men.

Authors:  Carol J Mottram; Sandra K Hunter; Ludo Rochette; Melissa K Anderson; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses.

Authors:  S K Hunter
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 6.311

10.  Movement accuracy changes muscle-activation strategies in female subjects during a novel single-leg weight-bearing task.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; Richard K Shields
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.