Literature DB >> 12546490

Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning.

Carl A Coelho1.   

Abstract

Narratives were elicited in two story tasks, retelling and generation, from two groups of adults, 55 with closed head injury (CHI) and 47 non-brain-injured (NBI), recruited from rehabilitation facilities in three northeastern states. Participants were classified, on the basis of their socioeconomic status (SES), as professional, skilled worker, or unskilled worker. Narratives were analyzed using five discourse measures at the levels of sentence production, intersentential cohesion, and story grammar. Discourse performance was then compared across groups, tasks, and SES levels. Discourse performance of the CHI group was also compared with their scores from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, a measure of executive functioning. Results indicated that two discourse measures distinguished the groups. The CHI participants produced significantly fewer words per T-unit and fewer T-units within episode structure than did the NBI group, which was attributed to difficulties with content organization. Performance on all five discourse measures differed for the story retelling versus the story generation tasks for both CHI and NBI groups. All participants produced longer and more grammatically complex T-units in the story generation task than in story retelling. However, cohesive adequacy and story grammar were better in the story retelling task than in the story generation task. It was therefore concluded that story generation was a more challenging task than story retelling for both groups. The only significant difference noted for SES involved the measure of intersentential cohesion. The unskilled workers demonstrated poorer cohesive adequacy than either the skilled workers or professionals, regardless of group or story task. Finally, modest correlations were noted between the discourse performance of the CHI group and scores from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in both story tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12546490     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/099)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  22 in total

1.  Organizational Structure Reduces Processing Load in the Prefrontal Cortex During Discourse Processing of Written Text: Implications for High-Level Reading Issues After TBI.

Authors:  Michael S Cannizzaro; Julie Dumas; Patricia Prelock; Paul Newhouse
Journal:  Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord       Date:  2012-08

2.  Analysis of narrative discourse structure as an ecologically relevant measure of executive function in adults.

Authors:  Michael S Cannizzaro; Carl A Coelho
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-12

3.  Cognitive task demands and discourse performance after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Lindsey Byom; Lyn S Turkstra
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Selling the story: narratives and charisma in adults with TBI.

Authors:  Corinne A Jones; Lyn S Turkstra
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Effects of social cognitive demand on Theory of Mind in conversations of adults with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Lindsey J Byom; Lyn Turkstra
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Microlinguistic processes that contribute to the ability to relay main events: influence of age.

Authors:  Gilson J Capilouto; Heather Harris Wright; Katherine McComas Maddy
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-12-10

7.  Language Disorders in Multilingual and Multicultural Populations.

Authors:  Mira Goral; Peggy S Conner
Journal:  Annu Rev Appl Linguist       Date:  2013-03

8.  Intact discourse cohesion and coherence following bilateral ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jake Kurczek; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Lexical diversity for adults with and without aphasia across discourse elicitation tasks.

Authors:  Gerasimos Fergadiotis; Heather Harris Wright
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Semantic Knowledge Use in Discourse Produced by Individuals with Anomic Aphasia.

Authors:  Stephen Kintz; Heather Harris Wright; Gerasimos Fergadiotis
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.