Literature DB >> 12544971

Economic evaluation of new therapies in critical illness.

Michael T Coughlin1, Derek C Angus.   

Abstract

The recent Food and Drug Administration approval of drotrecogin alfa (activated) and the potential of several other new therapies may represent the beginning of a breakthrough in the management of critical illness in the intensive care unit. However, their use in clinical practice will likely be dependent on a rigorous appraisal not only of their effects, but also of their costs. Novel therapies can no longer be judged simply by their effectiveness in treating illness, but must also be evaluated on an institutional and societal level on the basis of their cost. These considerations have important implications for the practicing intensivist, who will need to better understand the conduct and design of economic evaluations, including their strengths and weaknesses. In this article, we review the rationale behind economic evaluations of new therapies and the alternative economic approaches available. We then discuss in more detail the elements contained in a cost-effectiveness analysis, the preferred approach to pharmacoeconomic evaluation today.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544971     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200301001-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  10 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocol for severe sepsis: a prospective nation-wide study in Spain.

Authors:  David Suarez; Ricard Ferrer; Antonio Artigas; Izaskun Azkarate; José Garnacho-Montero; Gemma Gomà; Mitchell M Levy; Juan Carlos Ruiz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Colloid solutions: a clinical update.

Authors:  Tomi T Niemi; Ryo Miyashita; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Drotrecogin alfa (activated): a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in severe sepsis.

Authors:  James E Frampton; Rachel H Foster
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Modeling the impact of genetic screening technologies on healthcare: theoretical model for asthma in children.

Authors:  Emma Gutiérrez de Mesa; Ignacio Hidalgo; Panayotis Christidis; Juan Carlos Ciscar; Eva Vegas; Dolores Ibarreta
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.074

5.  Early versus late parenteral nutrition in ICU patients: cost analysis of the EPaNIC trial.

Authors:  Simon Vanderheyden; Michael P Casaer; Katrien Kesteloot; Steven Simoens; Thomas De Rijdt; Guido Peers; Pieter J Wouters; Jocelijn Coenegrachts; Tine Grieten; Katleen Polders; Ann Maes; Alexander Wilmer; Jasperina Dubois; Greet Van den Berghe; Dieter Mesotten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Similar cost-utility for double- and single-bundle techniques in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  N Sernert; E Hansson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Identification of high-risk subgroups in very elderly intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Sophia E de Rooij; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Marcel Levi; Evert de Jonge
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Recent progress in sepsis epidemiology--have we learned enough?

Authors:  Herwig Gerlach; Didier Keh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Simplified Acute Physiology Score III: a project for a new multidimensional tool for evaluating intensive care unit performance.

Authors:  Guillermo Vazquez; Salvador Benito; Ricardo Rivera
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-03-03       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus non-surgical management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Olof Westin; Mikael Svensson; Katarina Nilsson Helander; Kristian Samuelsson; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Nicklas Olsson; Jón Karlsson; Elisabeth Hansson Olofsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.