Literature DB >> 12544910

Two New York City hospitals' surgical response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack in New York City.

James G Cushman1, H Leon Pachter, Howard L Beaton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We describe the surgical response of two affiliated hospitals during the day of, and week following, the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attack at the World Trade Center in New York City. The city of New York has 18 state designated regional trauma centers that receive major trauma victims. The southern half of Manhattan is served by a burn center, two regional trauma centers, and a community hospital that is an affiliate of one of the regional trauma centers. This report accounts for the surgical response by a regional trauma center (Hospital A, located 2.5 miles from the World Trade Center) and its affiliate hospital (Hospital B, located 5 city blocks from the World Trade Center) on September 11th when two commercial jets crashed into the Twin Towers at the World Trade Center mall.
METHODS: Hospital A maintained a concurrent log of patients received during the first 5 hours, the first day, and the first week after the disaster which was kept by the Surgical Triage Officer. The trauma registry completed and verified this data by September 18th. Hospital B collected its data by hand counting and verification by chart review. Both hospitals, A and B, had established disaster plans that were implemented.
RESULTS: Nine hundred eleven patients were received by two affiliated hospitals from the World Trade Center attack. Seven hundred seventy six patients (85%) were walking wounded, sustaining mild inhalation and eye irritant injuries. One hundred thirty five (15%) were admitted with 18 (13%) of these undergoing surgery. Twenty two of the 23 transfers were from the community hospital to specialized orthopedic or burn centers. Of the 109 patients admitted to Hospital A, 30 were to the surgical service. The mean ISS score of these patients was 12. There were 4 deaths (within minutes of arrival at the hospital) and 6 delayed deaths (day 1-14). Excluding walking wounded and DOAs, the critical mortality rate was 37.5% overall.
CONCLUSION: The September 11th, 2001, terrorist attack in New York City, involving two commercial airliners crashing into the World Trade Center, led to 911 patients received at two affiliated hospitals in lower Manhattan. One hospital is a regional trauma center and one was an affiliate community hospital. Eighty five percent of the patients received were walking wounded. Of the rest, 13% underwent surgical procedures with an overall critical mortality rate of 37.5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544910     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200301000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  20 in total

1.  Multiple casualty incidents: lessons from the front line.

Authors:  Asher Hirshberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Analysis of responses of radiology personnel to a simulated mass casualty incident after the implementation of an automated alarm system in hospital emergency planning.

Authors:  Markus Körner; Lucas L Geyer; Stefan Wirth; Claus-Dieter Meisel; Maximilian F Reiser; Ulrich Linsenmaier
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2010-12-01

3.  Caring for a surge of Hurricane Katrina evacuees in primary care clinics.

Authors:  Thomas D Edwards; Richard A Young; Adonna F Lowe
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Disaster preparedness of Canadian trauma centres: the perspective of medical directors of trauma.

Authors:  David Gomez; Barbara Haas; Najma Ahmed; Homer Tien; Avery Nathens
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  The initial response to the Boston marathon bombing: lessons learned to prepare for the next disaster.

Authors:  Jonathan D Gates; Sandra Arabian; Paul Biddinger; Joe Blansfield; Peter Burke; Sarita Chung; Jonathan Fischer; Franklin Friedman; Alice Gervasini; Eric Goralnick; Alok Gupta; Andreas Larentzakis; Maria McMahon; Juan Mella; Yvonne Michaud; David Mooney; Reuven Rabinovici; Darlene Sweet; Andrew Ulrich; George Velmahos; Cheryl Weber; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Injury patterns from major urban terrorist bombings in trains: the Madrid experience.

Authors:  Fernando Turégano-Fuentes; P Caba-Doussoux; J M Jover-Navalón; E Martín-Pérez; D Fernández-Luengas; L Díez-Valladares; D Pérez-Díaz; P Yuste-García; H Guadalajara Labajo; R Ríos-Blanco; F Hernando-Trancho; F García-Moreno Nisa; M Sanz-Sánchez; C García-Fuentes; A Martínez-Virto; J L León-Baltasar; J Vazquez-Estévez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  [Primary care hospital for a mass disaster MANV IV. Experience from a mock disaster exercise].

Authors:  S Wolf; A Partenheimer; C Voigt; R Kunze; H A Adams; H Lill
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Knowing Your Team: Rapid Assessment of Residents and Fellows for Effective Horizontal Care Delivery in Emergency Events.

Authors:  Bradley Dennis; Alexandra Highet; Daniel Kendrick; Laura Mazer; Sean Loiselle; Hoda Bandeh-Ahmadi; Tanvi Gupta; Kenneth Abbott; Jarrett Lea; Thu Dang; Mischon Ramey; Brian George; Kyla Terhune
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-06

9.  Role of primary care physicians in mass casualty incidents.

Authors:  Neeti Rustagi; Jugal Kishore
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2012-10

10.  Utstein-style template for uniform data reporting of acute medical response in disasters.

Authors:  Michel Debacker; Ives Hubloue; Erwin Dhondt; Gerald Rockenschaub; Anders Rüter; Tudor Codreanu; Kristi L Koenig; Carl Schultz; Kobi Peleg; Pinchas Halpern; Samuel Stratton; Francesco Della Corte; Herman Delooz; Pier Luigi Ingrassia; Davide Colombo; Maaret Castrèn
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2012-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.