PURPOSE: The aims of this investigation were: 1). to establish the day-to-day reproducibility of open-circuit acetylene breathing for measuring exercise cardiac output (Q(c)) in young and older adults; and 2). to compare estimates of Q(c) from open-circuit acetylene breathing with estimates of Q(c) from previously established closed-circuit acetylene rebreathing. METHODS: Twenty men (10 young: 28 +/- 1 yr; 10 older: 61 +/- 1 yr (mean +/- SE)) performed cycle ergometry exercise on 3 separate days. Q(c) was estimated using open-circuit acetylene breathing on 2 d, and closed-circuit acetylene rebreathing on 1 d. RESULTS: Open-circuit acetylene breathing was highly reproducible (young: standard error of measurement (SEM) = 1.52 L.min (-1) limits of agreement (LOA) = 0.2 +/- 4.2 L.min (-1), coefficient of variation 6% < CV < 8%, day 2 = (0.9 x day 1) + 2.4, r = 0.90, P< 0.001, r (2)= 0.82; older: SEM = 0.94 L.min (-1), LOA = 0.1 +/- 2.8 L.min (-1), 4% < CV < 10%, day 2 = (1.0 x day 1) + 0, r = 0.91, < 0.001, r(2) = 0.82). Estimates of Q(c) from open-circuit acetylene breathing demonstrated good agreement with closed-circuit acetylene rebreathing (young: SEM = 1.52 L.min (-1), LOA = 0.9 +/- 4.4 L.min (-1), 5% < CV < 10%, open-circuit = (1.0 x closed-circuit) + 1.5, r = 0.89, < 0.001, r (2) = 0.79; older: SEM = 1.13 L.min (-1), LOA = 0.1 +/- 3.2 L.min (-1), 5% < CV < 9%, open-circuit = (0.9 x closed-circuit) + 1.6, r = 0.88, < 0.001, r(2) = 0.78). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that open-circuit acetylene breathing provides reproducible measurements of Q(c) during exercise that demonstrate good agreement with values obtained from the acetylene rebreathing procedure in young and older healthy men.
PURPOSE: The aims of this investigation were: 1). to establish the day-to-day reproducibility of open-circuit acetylene breathing for measuring exercise cardiac output (Q(c)) in young and older adults; and 2). to compare estimates of Q(c) from open-circuit acetylene breathing with estimates of Q(c) from previously established closed-circuit acetylene rebreathing. METHODS: Twenty men (10 young: 28 +/- 1 yr; 10 older: 61 +/- 1 yr (mean +/- SE)) performed cycle ergometry exercise on 3 separate days. Q(c) was estimated using open-circuit acetylene breathing on 2 d, and closed-circuit acetylene rebreathing on 1 d. RESULTS: Open-circuit acetylene breathing was highly reproducible (young: standard error of measurement (SEM) = 1.52 L.min (-1) limits of agreement (LOA) = 0.2 +/- 4.2 L.min (-1), coefficient of variation 6% < CV < 8%, day 2 = (0.9 x day 1) + 2.4, r = 0.90, P< 0.001, r (2)= 0.82; older: SEM = 0.94 L.min (-1), LOA = 0.1 +/- 2.8 L.min (-1), 4% < CV < 10%, day 2 = (1.0 x day 1) + 0, r = 0.91, < 0.001, r(2) = 0.82). Estimates of Q(c) from open-circuit acetylene breathing demonstrated good agreement with closed-circuit acetylene rebreathing (young: SEM = 1.52 L.min (-1), LOA = 0.9 +/- 4.4 L.min (-1), 5% < CV < 10%, open-circuit = (1.0 x closed-circuit) + 1.5, r = 0.89, < 0.001, r (2) = 0.79; older: SEM = 1.13 L.min (-1), LOA = 0.1 +/- 3.2 L.min (-1), 5% < CV < 9%, open-circuit = (0.9 x closed-circuit) + 1.6, r = 0.88, < 0.001, r(2) = 0.78). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that open-circuit acetylene breathing provides reproducible measurements of Q(c) during exercise that demonstrate good agreement with values obtained from the acetylene rebreathing procedure in young and older healthy men.
Authors: Bryan J Taylor; Jesper Kjaergaard; Eric M Snyder; Thomas P Olson; Bruce D Johnson Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Jennifer C Richards; Tyler K Johnson; Jessica N Kuzma; Mark C Lonac; Melani M Schweder; Wyatt F Voyles; Christopher Bell Journal: J Physiol Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Emma C Hart; Nisha Charkoudian; B Gunnar Wallin; Timothy B Curry; John H Eisenach; Michael J Joyner Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Jennifer C Richards; Mark C Lonac; Tyler K Johnson; Melani M Schweder; Christopher Bell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Samuel J Ridout; Beth A Parker; Sandra L Smithmyer; Joaquin U Gonzales; Kenneth C Beck; David N Proctor Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2009-12-03
Authors: Jesper Kjaergaard; Eric M Snyder; Christian Hassager; Thomas P Olson; Jae K Oh; Bruce D Johnson; Robert P Frantz Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2007-10-02 Impact factor: 3.078