Georg Sauer1, Helmut Deissler. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm Medical School, Germany. georg.sauer@medizin.uni-ulm.de
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Growth, invasion and metastasis of malignant tumors depend on angiogenesis, which is therefore considered an attractive therapeutic target and indicator of clinical outcome. Summarizing the results of very recent studies, we discuss the clinical relevance of vascularization of breast and gynecological tumors. RECENT FINDINGS: The prognostic values of directly assessed vascularity (microvessel density) and angiogenic factors have been confirmed for these malignancies, despite few contradictory results that may be due to methodological inaccuracy. In addition, many studies point to a role of angiogenesis as a predictor of response to both antiangiogenic and conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. For a conclusive evaluation, however, further studies covering all clinically relevant subgroups of patients are needed. Novel therapeutic approaches with inhibitors of angiogenesis are promising, although the adaptation of most experimentally proven approaches to clinical practice appears to be a laborious process. Furthermore, for an appropriate clinical evaluation of these drugs, newly defined endpoints of treatment and new monitoring systems reflecting their mode of action and the anticipated biological effects are required. SUMMARY: The prognostic and predictive value of angiogenic factors and microvessel density has been confirmed. Antiangiogenic therapy will most likely play an important role in future clinical management of malignant diseases.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Growth, invasion and metastasis of malignant tumors depend on angiogenesis, which is therefore considered an attractive therapeutic target and indicator of clinical outcome. Summarizing the results of very recent studies, we discuss the clinical relevance of vascularization of breast and gynecological tumors. RECENT FINDINGS: The prognostic values of directly assessed vascularity (microvessel density) and angiogenic factors have been confirmed for these malignancies, despite few contradictory results that may be due to methodological inaccuracy. In addition, many studies point to a role of angiogenesis as a predictor of response to both antiangiogenic and conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. For a conclusive evaluation, however, further studies covering all clinically relevant subgroups of patients are needed. Novel therapeutic approaches with inhibitors of angiogenesis are promising, although the adaptation of most experimentally proven approaches to clinical practice appears to be a laborious process. Furthermore, for an appropriate clinical evaluation of these drugs, newly defined endpoints of treatment and new monitoring systems reflecting their mode of action and the anticipated biological effects are required. SUMMARY: The prognostic and predictive value of angiogenic factors and microvessel density has been confirmed. Antiangiogenic therapy will most likely play an important role in future clinical management of malignant diseases.