Literature DB >> 12544476

Attitudes of African American premedical students toward genetic testing and screening.

Sara L Laskey1, Joseph Williams, Jacqui Pierre-Louis, MaryAnn O'Riordan, Anne Matthews, Nathaniel H Robin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Genetic research is progressing at a rapid rate. While most view genetic advances favorably, concerns regarding eugenics and discrimination based on genetic test results have been raised. These concerns have been found among all groups studied; however, they have particular relevance for members of the African American community. Studies have shown that because of a long history of negative experiences, African Americans have a general mistrust of the medical establishment. It is unclear whether these negative attitudes encompass genetic advances. Because there is little empiric data in the literature, it is not known whether African Americans have a positive view of genetic advances or whether they have the same level of mistrust as is seen in their attitudes toward other forms of biomedical research.
METHODS: This study was conducted as an initial effort to examine the attitudes of African Americans toward recent genetic advances and, specifically, genetic testing. A cohort of 97 college-age minority students, including 78 African Americans, participating in the Health Career Enhancement for Minorities Program (HCEM) at Case Western Reserve University were surveyed. Surveys were made available before and after the summer long course, which included five lectures on basic genetic principles and medical genetics.
RESULTS: Both African American students and other minority students initially (questionnaire prior to HCEM course) had an overall positive view of genetic testing. The vast majority supported genetic testing for preventive care (95%) and presymptomatic detection of disease (88%) and agreed that it should be easily available (83%). However, several concerns were expressed as well, including fears about discrimination (68%), privacy (68%), that abortions will become more common (51%), and eugenics (37%). It is interesting that in the postcourse questionnaire, the percentages of positive views remained similar to those of the precourse survey, but the number of respondents expressing concerns increased. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that the minority students surveyed view many aspects of genetic testing and other advances favorably. However, these students expressed concerns about discrimination, privacy, and eugenics. These concerns were increased, not lessened, by exposure to genetics education. One possible explanation for this observation is that the students had a greater understanding of the issues regarding genetic testing after the HCEM lectures and discussion. Of note, there was a greater negative response toward genetic screening programs among the African American students compared with the non-African American minority students. This suggests that the negative attitudes of African Americans toward biomedical research do extend to some aspects of genetics and that educational programs must be designed and implemented if this community is going to receive the maximum benefits of this advancing technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544476     DOI: 10.1097/00125817-200301000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  24 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic differences in direct-to-consumer genetic tests awareness in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic and numeracy correlates.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; J Scott Roberts; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Using Public-Private Partnerships to Mitigate Disparities in Access to Genetic Services: Lessons from Wisconsin.

Authors:  Laura Senier; Matthew Kearney; Jason Orne
Journal:  Adv Med Sociol       Date:  2015

4.  Inclusion of diverse populations in genomic research and health services: Genomix workshop report.

Authors:  Savio S Mathew; Julian Barwell; Nasaim Khan; Ella Lynch; Michael Parker; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-07-28

5.  Perspectives on Precision Health Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Communities and the Physicians That Serve Them.

Authors:  Lisa G Rosas; Catherine Nasrallah; Van Ta Park; Jan J Vasquez; Ysabel Duron; Owen Garrick; Riccesha Hattin; Mildred Cho; Sean P David; Jill Evans; Rhonda McClinton-Brown; Christopher Martin
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.847

6.  Knowledge, awareness, and attitude of premarital screening with special focus on sickle cell disease: a study from Odisha.

Authors:  Basanta Kumar Bindhani; Naorem Kiranmala Devi; Jayanta Kumar Nayak
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-06-18

7.  Perceptions regarding genetic testing in populations at risk for nephropathy.

Authors:  Barry I Freedman; Alison J Fletcher; Vivek R Sanghani; Mitzie Spainhour; Angelina W Graham; Gregory B Russell; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Ana S Iltis; Nancy M P King
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.754

8.  Views of Black nurses toward genetic research and testing.

Authors:  Yolanda M Powell-Young; Ida J Spruill
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.176

9.  Effects of genetic counseling for hypertension on changes in lifestyle behaviors among African-American women.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Y Taylor; Chun Yi Wu
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2009-07

10.  An exploration of attitudes among black Americans towards psychiatric genetic research.

Authors:  Eleanor Murphy; Azure Thompson
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.