Literature DB >> 12544125

Areolar-cutaneous "junction" injections to augment sentinel node count activity.

Borys R Krynyckyi1, Chun K Kim, Karina Mosci, Boris J Fedorciw, Zhuang-Yu Zhang, Helena Lipszyc, Josef Machac.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors report on a modified lymphoscintigraphy protocol for increasing activity in the sentinel node (SN) through a specific technique (LymphoBoost). It consists of an areolar-cutaneous "junction" injection, using a very shallow, high-volume, high-specific-activity injection of 100% filtered Tc-99m sulfur colloid, as an adjunct to their standard protocol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results from a previously optimized protocol (group 1, n = 28) were compared with those from their new protocol (group 2, n = 85), which consisted of two sets of consecutively applied (within 12 to 20 minutes) injections: group 2A composed of perilesional and intradermal injections (similar to the previous group 1) followed by group 2B LymphoBoost injections within 12 to 20 minutes in the same patients. Regions of interest were drawn around the SN and the injection sites (IS) at the end of the studies to calculate the end-of-study SN:IS ratio for both group 1 and group 2 studies. The SN:IS ratio is generally independent of dose and is a measurement of the "efficiency" of getting activity from the IS to the SN.
RESULTS: The mean SN:IS ratio in group 2 was 3.34 times greater than that in group 1 studies (P < 0.0005). The median SN:IS ratio was 3.53 times greater in the group 2 studies. Many cases showed a dramatic increase in SN counts before the LymphoBoost injection was even completed, with more than 5% of injected activity reaching nodes at the end of the study in some patients. Multiple different lymphatic pathways were noted, but all led to the same node(s). No significant disagreement between group 2A and group 2B results was noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Areolar-cutaneous junction injections, performed under these conditions, augment SN activity dramatically in most patients. Hotter nodes provide several benefits, especially when next-day surgery is contemplated, and should also reduce the extent of dissection needed to remove the sentinel node.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544125     DOI: 10.1097/01.RLU.0000048942.43732.1F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  5 in total

1.  Using the intraoperative hand held probe without lymphoscintigraphy or using only dye correlates with higher sensory morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Suk Chul Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Renee M Moadel; Chun K Kim; Samprit Chatterjee; Michail K Shafir; Arlene Travis; Josef Machac; Borys R Krynyckyi
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and triangulated patient body marking are important parts of the sentinel node process in breast cancer.

Authors:  Borys R Krynyckyi; Suk Chul Kim; Chun K Kim
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Lymphoscintigraphy and triangulated body marking for morbidity reduction during sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Borys R Krynyckyi; Michail K Shafir; Suk Chul Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Arlene Travis; Renee M Moadel; Chun K Kim
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-11-08

4.  The sentinel node in breast cancer: an update.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 5.  The sentinel node in breast cancer.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.