Literature DB >> 12544038

Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: a comparison of the translabyrinthine, middle fossa, and retrosigmoid approaches.

Samuel S Becker1, Robert K Jackler, Lawrence H Pitts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the choice of surgical approach affects the rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage in patients who have undergone surgical resection of acoustic neuroma. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Three hundred patients who underwent surgery for acoustic neuromas were selected by consecutive medical record number until 100 resections via each surgical approach (translabyrinthine, middle fossa, and retrosigmoid) had been gathered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical approach used, cerebrospinal fluid leak incidence, tumor size, patient age.
RESULTS: Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak of any severity was observed in 13% of translabyrinthine, 10% of middle fossa, and 10% of retrosigmoid patients. These difference in the rate of cerebrospinal fluid leakage were not statistically significant (p = 0.82). The majority of leaks were managed conservatively with fluid and activity restriction, often accompanied by a period of lumbar subarachnoid drainage. There was a need to return to the operating room for a definitive procedure in 4% of translabyrinthine, 2% of middle fossa, and 3% retrosigmoid patients; again not statistically different among the approaches (p = 0.43). Tumor size was not correlated with cerebrospinal fluid leak rate (p = 0.13). Patient age, for patients older than 50 years, was suggestive of increased odds of cerebrospinal fluid leak (p = 0.06).
CONCLUSION: Neither surgical approach nor tumor size affects the rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage or the necessity of managing a leak with a return to the operating room. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage rates have remained stable in recent decades despite numerous innovative attempts to improve dural closure, seal transected air cell tracts, and occlude anatomic pathways. The finding that leak rates were similar among three dissimilar surgical techniques suggests that factors other than techniques of wound closure, such as transient postoperative rises in cerebrospinal fluid pressure, may be responsible for these recalcitrant cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544038     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200301000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  22 in total

1.  Petrous carotid exposure with eustachian tube preservation: a morphometric elucidation.

Authors:  Anirban Deep Banerjee; Jai Deep Thakur; Haim Ezer; Prashant Chittiboina; Bharat Guthikonda; Anil Nanda
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-09

2.  The enlarged translabyrinthine and transapical extension type I approach for large vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  N Jayashankar; K P Morwani; S K Sankhla; R Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-01

3.  Biocompatible bacterial cellulose membrane in dural defect repair of rat.

Authors:  Frederico de Melo Tavares de Lima; Flávia Cristina Morone Pinto; Belmira Lara da Silveira Andrade-da-Costa; Jaiurte Gomes Martins da Silva; Olávio Campos Júnior; José Lamartine de Andrade Aguiar
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  A novel graft material for preventing cerebrospinal fluid leakage in skull base reconstruction: technical note of perifascial areolar tissue.

Authors:  Nakamasa Hayashi; Koichi Mitsuya; Katsuya Gorai; Keita Inoue; Ichiro Ito; Masahiro Nakagawa; Yoko Nakasu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-08-11

Review 5.  Post-operative complications after removal of sporadic vestibular schwannoma via retrosigmoid-suboccipital approach: current diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Stylianos Charalampakis; Dimitrios Koutsimpelas; Haralampos Gouveris; Wolf Mann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Management of cerebrospinal fluid leaks after vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Brannon D Mangus; Alejandro Rivas; Mi Jin Yoo; JoAnn Alvarez; George B Wanna; David S Haynes; Marc L Bennett
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Utilization of preoperative cerebrospinal fluid drain in skull base surgery.

Authors:  Alexander G Bien; Bradley Bowdino; Gary Moore; Lyal Leibrock
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-03

8.  Management of CSF leakage after microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach.

Authors:  Matthias Scheich; Christian Ginzkey; Desiree Ehrmann-Müller; Wafaa Shehata-Dieler; Rudolf Hagen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannomas: complication avoidance.

Authors:  Shervin Rahimpour; Allan H Friedman; Takanori Fukushima; Ali R Zomorodi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Characteristics and management of hydrocephalus associated with vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paolo di Russo; Arianna Fava; Alberto Vandenbulcke; Akinori Miyakoshi; Michihiro Kohno; Alexander I Evins; Vincenzo Esposito; Roberta Morace
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.