Literature DB >> 12543526

Evaluating health care interventions in the European Union.

David McDaid1, Richard Cookson.   

Abstract

This paper examines the current state of evaluations of health care interventions in the European Union, from the identification and commissioning of research through to its impact on policy and practice. Material is drawn from a survey conducted for the ASTEC project as well as a review of literature. Although the use of evaluative research has increased substantially in the last decade, both the pace of change and preferred research methodologies employed differ markedly. Much research still concentrates on issues of safety, efficacy and effectiveness, although there is evidence of an increasing emphasis on cost-effectiveness. Many countries are beginning to introduce systems linking economic evaluation to the decision-making process, while networks for the exchange of information continue to evolve. Research capacity in the public sector, although improving, is uneven, in part due to the uncertainty over long term career prospects and competition from industry. Capacity building measures should in particular ensure that dissemination expertise is strengthened, and that more emphasis is placed on developing receptor capacity within different stakeholder groups. Linking knowledge production to changes in practice remains a key challenge. Further research on implementation and impact assessment is required, to help demonstrate the value of evaluations on both policy and practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12543526     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00060-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  6 in total

Review 1.  Can administrative claim file review be used to gather physical therapy, occupational therapy, and psychology payment data and functional independence measure scores? Implications for rehabilitation providers in the private health sector.

Authors:  Viivi Riis; Susan Jaglal; Kathryn Boschen; Jan Walker; Molly Verrier
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Health research: measuring the social, health and economic benefits.

Authors:  Cyril Frank; Edward Nason
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  EAES recommendations on methodology of innovation management in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Edmund A M Neugebauer; Monika Becker; Gerhard F Buess; Alfred Cuschieri; Hans-Peter Dauben; Abe Fingerhut; Karl H Fuchs; Brigitte Habermalz; Leonid Lantsberg; Mario Morino; Stella Reiter-Theil; Gabriela Soskuty; Wolfgang Wayand; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Commentary: approaches, strengths, and limitations of avoidable mortality.

Authors:  Glòria Pérez; Maica Rodríguez-Sanz; Eva Cirera; Katherine Pérez; Rosa Puigpinós; Carme Borrell
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.222

5.  Cost and cost-effectiveness of nationwide school-based helminth control in Uganda: intra-country variation and effects of scaling-up.

Authors:  Simon Brooker; Narcis B Kabatereine; Fiona Fleming; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 6.  Sentinel Amenable Mortality: A New Way to Assess the Quality of Healthcare by Examining Causes of Premature Death for Which Highly Efficacious Medical Interventions Are Available.

Authors:  Montse Vergara-Duarte; Carme Borrell; Glòria Pérez; Juan Carlos Martín-Sánchez; Ramon Clèries; Maria Buxó; Èrica Martínez-Solanas; Yutaka Yasui; Carles Muntaner; Joan Benach
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.