Literature DB >> 12543443

Event-related potentials to Stroop and reverse Stroop stimuli.

Carmen M Atkinson1, Karen A Drysdale, W R Fulham.   

Abstract

In the Stroop task, the latency of response to a colour is either faster or slower in the presence of a congruent or incongruent colour-word (J. Exp. Psychol. 18 (1935) 643). Debate remains as to whether this effect occurs during early stimulus processing or late response competition. The present study examined the task using reaction time (RT) and event-related potentials to determine temporal differences in this processing. The 'reverse Stroop' effect (where colour interferes with processing of a colour-word) which is much less well established, was also examined. Standard Stroop interference was found as well as reverse Stroop interference. A late lateralised negativity at frontal sites was greater for Incongruent trials and also for the word-response (reverse Stroop) task, and was interpreted as semantic selection and word-rechecking effects. Late positive component latency effects generally mirrored the speed of processing of the different conditions found in RT data. Stroop effects were also found in early temporal N100 and parietal P100 components, which differentiated Congruent from Incongruent trials in the reverse Stroop but not the standard Stroop, and were interpreted as early perception of physical mismatch between the colour and word. It was concluded that Stroop stimuli are processed in parallel in a network of brain areas rather than a particular structure and that Stroop interference arises at the output stage.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12543443     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00038-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  21 in total

1.  Processing numerosity, length and duration in a three-dimensional Stroop-like task: towards a gradient of processing automaticity?

Authors:  Valérie Dormal; Mauro Pesenti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-01

2.  Stroop matching task: role of feature selection and temporal modulation.

Authors:  Isabel A David; Eliane Volchan; Jaime Vila; Andreas Keil; Letícia de Oliveira; Aydamari J P Faria-Júnior; Pandelis Perakakis; Elisa C Dias; Izabela Mocaiber; Mirtes G Pereira; Walter Machado-Pinheiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people with substance dependence and behavioural addictions.

Authors:  Maartje Luijten; Marise W J Machielsen; Dick J Veltman; Robert Hester; Lieuwe de Haan; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  Emotion and goal-directed behavior: ERP evidence on cognitive and emotional conflict.

Authors:  Artyom Zinchenko; Philipp Kanske; Christian Obermeier; Erich Schröger; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  When Conflict Cannot be Avoided: Relative Contributions of Early Selection and Frontal Executive Control in Mitigating Stroop Conflict.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Sean Deering; John T Serences
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict.

Authors:  L Gregory Appelbaum; Carsten N Boehler; Robert Won; Lauren Davis; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Event-Related Potentials and the Stroop Effect.

Authors:  Babur Sahinoglu; Gamze Dogan
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-02

8.  Is conflict monitoring supramodal? Spatiotemporal dynamics of cognitive control processes in an auditory Stroop task.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Mario Liotti; Ricardo Perez; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  The rapid distraction of attentional resources toward the source of incongruent stimulus input during multisensory conflict.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Alexandra E Todisco; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect.

Authors:  L G Appelbaum; K L Meyerhoff; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.