Literature DB >> 12543165

Video-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel.

Yasushi Komatsuzaki1, Kentaro Ochi, Natsuki Sugiura, Makoto Hyodo, Atsushi Okamoto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits in video-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy by using an ultrasonically activated scalpel (HS: Harmonic Scalpel(R), Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and a special handmade lifting device.
METHODS: The study cohort consisted of four male patients. We considered that the intraglandular part sialolithiasis of the submandibular glands was the main indicator for this technique. Under general anesthesia, a 15-20 mm skin incision was performed just above the inferior margin of the submandibular gland lying parallel to the mandible. We used a 4 mm diameter endoscope that we normally use for paranasal sinus surgery. Appropriate working space was created using a special handmade lifting device that was constructed from a wooden tongue depressor. By using HS, we dissected between the capsule and the circumferential tissue in order to minimize the possibility of damage to the facial nerve and lingual nerve. The submandibular gland was pulled out through the surgical wound, and Wharton's duct was then suture-ligated and resected.
RESULTS: Endoscopic operation without recourse to conventional open surgery was achieved in all patients. No patients suffered any complications, such as functional disorder of the marginal mandibular, hypoglossal and lingual nerves, or wound hematoma formation. Excellent cosmesis was obtained in all patients. The amount of intraoperative bleeding ranged from 10 to 60 ml (mean: 38.0 ml). The operating time ranged from 175 to 250 min (mean: 232.5 min).
CONCLUSIONS: We applied two useful devices to achieve the endoscopic submandibular surgery: an HS and a special handmade lifting device. Excellent cosmesis was obtained in all patients without complications. The disadvantage of this method is that the surgery is more time-consuming than conventional open methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12543165     DOI: 10.1016/s0385-8146(02)00140-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx        ISSN: 0385-8146            Impact factor:   1.863


  8 in total

1.  Endoscope assisted submandibular sialadenectomy: the face-lift approach.

Authors:  Han Su Kim; Sung Min Chung; So Young Pae; Hae Sang Park
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Minimally invasive video-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy: surgical technique and results from two institutions.

Authors:  Pablo L Parente Arias; Mario M Fernández Fernández; Patricia Varela Vázquez; Beatriz de Diego Muñoz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscope-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy: a review of outcomes, complications, and ethical concerns.

Authors:  Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Niels Christian Pausch; Kittipong Dhanuthai; Kraison Sappayatosok; Pichit Ngamwannagul; Ute Bauer; Robert Sader; Alexander D Rapidis; Christian Hervé; Alexander Hemprich
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-05-21

4.  Video-assisted submandibular resection: two-step technique.

Authors:  Yasser Hamza; Rafik Khalil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoscopic neck surgery.

Authors:  P K Chowbey; Vandana Soni; R Khullar; Anil Sharma; M Baijal
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Focus harmonic scalpel compared to conventional haemostasis in open total thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Emanuele Ferri; Enrico Armato; Giacomo Spinato; Roberto Spinato
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-29

7.  Harmonic scalpel versus conventional haemostasis in neck dissection: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Emanuele Ferri; Enrico Armato; Giacomo Spinato; Marcello Lunghi; Giancarlo Tirelli; Roberto Spinato
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-12-22

Review 8.  Complications of traditional and modern therapeutic salivary approaches.

Authors:  O Nahlieli
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.124

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.