Elisabeth Weiss1, Clemens F Hess. 1. Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Göttingen, Germany. eweiss@gwdg.de
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the impact of interobserver variability in the contouring of gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and clinical target volumes (CTVs) on the global geometric accuracy in radiation therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a review of the currently available literature, the magnitude of interobserver variability is analyzed, causes and consequences are discussed. Uncertainties due to inconsistencies in contouring are related to other sources of geometric errors, particularly patient positioning and organ motion. RESULTS: Interobserver variability is a major -- for some tumor locations probably the largest -- factor contributing to geometric inaccuracy. Causes are multifactorial and include image- and observer-related factors, such as the subjective interpretation of image information. CONCLUSION: Consequences to reduce interobserver variability are proposed, among others the selection of adequate imaging modalities, intensified radiologic training, and the use of telecommunication tools.
AIM: To evaluate the impact of interobserver variability in the contouring of gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and clinical target volumes (CTVs) on the global geometric accuracy in radiation therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a review of the currently available literature, the magnitude of interobserver variability is analyzed, causes and consequences are discussed. Uncertainties due to inconsistencies in contouring are related to other sources of geometric errors, particularly patient positioning and organ motion. RESULTS: Interobserver variability is a major -- for some tumor locations probably the largest -- factor contributing to geometric inaccuracy. Causes are multifactorial and include image- and observer-related factors, such as the subjective interpretation of image information. CONCLUSION: Consequences to reduce interobserver variability are proposed, among others the selection of adequate imaging modalities, intensified radiologic training, and the use of telecommunication tools.
Authors: Felix Heinemann; Fred Röhner; Marianne Schmucker; Gregor Bruggmoser; Karl Henne; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Hermann Frommhold Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-03-28 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: A Kovacs; J Hadjiev; F Lakosi; G Antal; C Vandulek; E Somogyine Ezer; P Bogner; A Horvath; I Repa Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 3.201