Literature DB >> 12540083

The problem with measuring patient perceptions of outcome with existing outcome measures in foot and ankle surgery.

Jan Parker1, Christopher J Nester, Andrew F Long, Jim Barrie.   

Abstract

Quality outcome measures are the cornerstone of clinical research. A review of outcome measures used in foot and ankle surgery research reveals that the issues of validity, reliability and responsiveness of outcome measures have not been addressed. Most reports in the literature have attempted to evaluate patient perceptions of outcome following foot surgery. Underlying the many difficulties with these outcome measures is a lack of understanding of what patients perceive to be important in terms of outcome. Consequently none of the existing outcome measures can claim to be valid measures of patient perceptions of outcome, as there has been no research uncovering these perceptions. In addition, measures of general health status and quality of life in relation to outcome of foot and ankle surgery have been largely ignored to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12540083     DOI: 10.1177/107110070302400109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  10 in total

Review 1.  Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri; Pascal F Rippstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Jane Coffey; Helen Doll; Grahame Lavis; Paul Cooke; Mark Herron; Crispin Jenkinson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A qualitative study to understand patients' experiences of their post-operative outcomes following forefoot surgery.

Authors:  Lorelle Louise Dismore; Anna van Wersch; Rebecca Critchley; Aradhyula Murty; Katherine Swainston
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 4.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Megan N Houston; Johanna M Hoch; Matthew C Hoch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Quality-of-life outcome after hallux valgus surgery.

Authors:  Carlos Saro; Irene Jensen; Urban Lindgren; Li Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.440

Review 6.  The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christophe Eechaute; Peter Vaes; Lieve Van Aerschot; Sara Asman; William Duquet
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Instruments to measure patient experience of health care quality in hospitals: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Michelle Beattie; William Lauder; Iain Atherton; Douglas J Murphy
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-04

8.  Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Michael R Backhouse; Karen A Vinall-Collier; Anthony C Redmond; Philip S Helliwell; Anne-Maree Keenan
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints.

Authors:  Tae-Sung In; Jin-Hwa Jung; Keunjo Kim; Kyoung-Sim Jung; Hwi-Young Cho
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-01-30

10.  Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.

Authors:  Dariusch Arbab; Katharina Kuhlmann; Christoph Schnurr; Bertil Bouillon; Christian Lüring; Dietmar König
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.