Literature DB >> 12538744

Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion studies in patients with end-stage renal disease assessed for kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Christian G Rabbat1, Darin J Treleaven, J David Russell, David Ludwin, Deborah J Cook.   

Abstract

The prognostic utility of myocardial perfusion studies (MPS) such as thallium scintigraphy and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for stratifying cardiac risk among candidates for kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation is uncertain. This study is a meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of MPS results on future myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac death (CD) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) assessed for kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation. MEDLINE was searched using combinations of MeSH headings and text words for transplantation, coronary artery disease, prognosis, end-stage renal disease, and noninvasive cardiac testing (nuclear scintigraphy and DSE) for primary studies. Studies were included if they reported MPS results and cardiac events in patients assessed for kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation. Methodologic study quality and outcome data were independently abstracted in duplicate by two researchers. The relative risks (RR) of MI and CD were calculated using a random effects model. Twelve articles met all inclusion criteria; 12 studies reported CD, and 9 reported MI. In eight studies, thallium scintigraphy was used (four with pharmacologic stress, four with exercise stress), whereas four used DSE. When compared with negative tests, positive tests had a significantly increased RR of MI (2.73 [95% CI, 1.25 to 5.97]; P = 0.01) and CD (2.92 [95% CI, 1.66 to 5.12]; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses of studies of diabetic patients indicated that positive tests were associated with a RR of CD 3.95 (95% CI, 1.48 to 10.5; P = 0.006) and a RR of MI 2.68 (95% CI, 0.95 to 7.57; P = 0.06) when compared with negative tests. In studies evaluating mixed populations of diabetic and nondiabetic patients, positive tests were associated with a RR of CD 2.52 (95% CI, 1.25 to 5.08; P = 0.01) and with a RR of MI 2.79 (95% CI, 0.85 to 9.21; P = 0.09) when compared with a negative test. The presence of reversible defects was associated with an increased risk of MI in diabetic patients and of CD in both subgroups; fixed defects were associated with an increased risk of CD but not MI. It is concluded that positive MPS are useful in identifying patients with significantly increased risk of future MI and CD in both diabetic and nondiabetic ESRD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12538744     DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000047560.51444.3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  30 in total

1.  A call to action: variability in guidelines for cardiac evaluation before renal transplantation.

Authors:  Scott E Friedman; Robert T Palac; David M Zlotnick; Michael C Chobanian; Salvatore P Costa
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Myocardial perfusion SPECT "screening" at the start of dialysis.

Authors:  Sabha Bhatti; Abdul Hakeem
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  The role of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging for asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Brian G Abbott; Timothy M Bateman; Ron Blankstein; Dennis A Calnon; Jeffrey A Leppo; Jamshid Maddahi; Matthew M Schumaecker; Leslee J Shaw; R Parker Ward; David G Wolinsky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Hybrid myocardial imaging for risk stratification prior to kidney transplantation: added value of coronary calcium and epicardial adipose tissue.

Authors:  Cristina Karohl; Luis D'Marco; Antonio Bellasi; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Incidence and risk factors of coronary heart disease in elderly patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Authors:  Lygeri P Soubassi; Theodore C Chiras; Emmanuel D Papadakis; George D Poulos; Dimitrios I Chaniotis; Ioannis P Tsapakidis; Sofia P Soubassi; Stylianos N Zerefos; Nikolaos S Zerefos; Dimitrios A Valis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Does hybrid imaging have a role in cardiac risk evaluation of the pre-renal transplant patient?

Authors:  Abdul Hakeem; Sabha Bhatti; Su Min Chang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Non-invasive risk assessment in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Abdul Hakeem; Sabha Bhatti; Alejandro R Trevino; Zainab Samad; Su Min Chang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Prognostic impact of SPECT-MPI after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Wael Abuzeid; Robert M Iwanochko; Xuesong Wang; S Joseph Kim; Mansoor Husain; Douglas S Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Cardiovascular risk assessment among potential kidney transplant candidates: approaches and controversies.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Frank P Hurst; Rahul M Jindal; Todd C Villines; Jeffrey S Kunz; Christina M Yuan; Paul J Hauptman; Kevin C Abbott
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Coronary risk assessment and management options in chronic kidney disease patients prior to kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Vanji Karthikeyan; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.