Literature DB >> 12538382

Depth of insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.

M S Stix1, C J O'Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The depth of insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is unknown. We measured depth of insertion in satisfactorily positioned PLMAs.
METHODS: All women received size 4 masks and men size 5 masks. We measured the position of the integral bite block in relation to the upper incisors documented in patients over a 6-month period. Depth of insertion was scored by dividing the integral bite block into quarters. Satisfactory positioning of the ProSeal itself was determined by (i) positive 'suprasternal notch test', (ii) no venting via the drain tube during maximal lung inflation, and (iii) an unobstructed airway.
RESULTS: We studied 274 patients (147 women and 127 men). The midway point of the bite block was proximal to the incisors (e.g. within the oropharynx) in 78% of women (95% CI 71-85%) and 92% of men (95% CI 87-97). The standard deviation for the depth distribution in women was 0.8 cm and for men was 1.0 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: Usually most of the integral bite block lies within the oropharynx. It was never normal for the entire bite block to stick out of the mouth (4 SD from the mean for both men and women). The position of the integral bite block relative to the upper incisors gives valuable information during assessment of PLMA position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12538382     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  4 in total

Review 1.  [S1 guidelines on airway management].

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  S1 guidelines on airway management : Guideline of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  T Piepho; E Cavus; R Noppens; C Byhahn; V Dörges; B Zwissler; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Second generation laryngeal masks : expanded indications].

Authors:  A Timmermann; E A Nickel; F Pühringer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Troubleshooting ProSeal LMA.

Authors:  Bimla Sharma; Jayashree Sood; Chand Sahai; V P Kumra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.