A Sarang1, J Dinsmore. 1. Department of Anaesthesia, Atkinson Morley's Hospital, Copse Hill, Wimbledon, London SW20 0NE, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing trend towards performing craniotomy awake. The challenge for the anaesthetist is to provide adequate analgesia and sedation, haemodynamic stability, and a safe airway, with an awake, cooperative patient for neurological testing. METHODS: The records of all patients who had awake craniotomy at our institution were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups according to anaesthetic technique. Patients in Group 1 were sedated throughout the procedure. Patients in Groups 2 and 3 had an asleep-awake-asleep technique. Those in Group 2 were anaesthetized with a propofol infusion and fentanyl, and breathed spontaneously through a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Patients in Group 3 had total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil, and ventilation was controlled using an LMA. We noted the incidence of complications in each group. RESULTS: There were 99 procedures carried out between 1989 and 2002. Group 3 had the fewest complications. No patients in Group 3 developed hypercapnia (E'(CO(2)) >6 kPa), compared with all of the patients in Group 2. Patients in Group 1 had no E'(CO(2)) monitoring, but 7% developed airway obstruction. No patients in Group 3 required additional analgesia for pain, compared with 70% of patients in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a technique for craniotomy, which facilitates awake neurological testing, is safe, and has good patient satisfaction.
BACKGROUND: There is an increasing trend towards performing craniotomy awake. The challenge for the anaesthetist is to provide adequate analgesia and sedation, haemodynamic stability, and a safe airway, with an awake, cooperative patient for neurological testing. METHODS: The records of all patients who had awake craniotomy at our institution were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups according to anaesthetic technique. Patients in Group 1 were sedated throughout the procedure. Patients in Groups 2 and 3 had an asleep-awake-asleep technique. Those in Group 2 were anaesthetized with a propofol infusion and fentanyl, and breathed spontaneously through a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Patients in Group 3 had total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil, and ventilation was controlled using an LMA. We noted the incidence of complications in each group. RESULTS: There were 99 procedures carried out between 1989 and 2002. Group 3 had the fewest complications. No patients in Group 3 developed hypercapnia (E'(CO(2)) >6 kPa), compared with all of the patients in Group 2. Patients in Group 1 had no E'(CO(2)) monitoring, but 7% developed airway obstruction. No patients in Group 3 required additional analgesia for pain, compared with 70% of patients in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a technique for craniotomy, which facilitates awake neurological testing, is safe, and has good patient satisfaction.
Authors: U Schulz; D Keh; G Fritz; C Barner; T Kerner; G-H Schneider; T Trottenberg; A Kupsch; W Boemke Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 1.041