Literature DB >> 12537966

Discriminating two classes of toxicants through expression analysis of HepG2 cells with DNA arrays.

Y Hong1, U R Müller, F Lai.   

Abstract

Microarray technology provides a rapid and cost-effective method to associate specific cellular responses with unique gene expression patterns. If characteristic expression patterns of a small number of genes could be associated with drug toxicity, this association may be used for toxicity prediction, and thereby to reduce the need for traditional toxicity testing. To test this hypothesis, we have designed an array composed of 92 known human genes of toxicological interest (including seven housekeeping genes) and eight bacterial controls. HepG2 cells were treated with either ethanol or one of two quinone containing anticancer drugs, mitomycin C or doxorubicin. RNA was isolated from treated and untreated cells, differentially labeled with fluorescent dyes, and then hybridized to the array. Our results show that the expression patterns induced by ethanol and the anticancer drugs are different. Both of the anticancer drugs, but not ethanol had a differential effect on the regulation of several genes, including CYP4F2/3, CYP3A3, TNFRSF6 and CHES1, demonstrating that the two drugs might function through a similar mechanism, which differs from that of ethanol. These results suggest that microarray-based expression analysis may offer a rapid and efficient means for assessing drug toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12537966     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2333(02)00122-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  8 in total

Review 1.  Toxicogenomics in drug discovery and drug development: potential applications and future challenges.

Authors:  Tin Oo Khor; Sherif Ibrahim; Ah-Ng Tony Kong
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Gene expression profiling and its practice in drug development.

Authors:  Murty V Chengalvala; Vargheese M Chennathukuzhi; Daniel S Johnston; Panayiotis E Stevis; Gregory S Kopf
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.236

3.  Discovery of characteristic molecular signatures for the simultaneous prediction and detection of environmental pollutants.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Song; Han-Seam Choi; Yong-Keun Park; Jae-Chun Ryu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing.

Authors:  Edward L LeCluyse; Rafal P Witek; Melvin E Andersen; Mark J Powers
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Integrating transcriptomics and metabonomics to unravel modes-of-action of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Danyel Jennen; Ainhoa Ruiz-Aracama; Christina Magkoufopoulou; Ad Peijnenburg; Arjen Lommen; Joost van Delft; Jos Kleinjans
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-08-31

6.  Investigation of the molecular profile of basal cell carcinoma using whole genome microarrays.

Authors:  Lorraine O'Driscoll; Jason McMorrow; Padraig Doolan; Eadaoin McKiernan; Jai Prakash Mehta; Eoin Ryan; Patrick Gammell; Helena Joyce; Norma O'Donovan; Nicholas Walsh; Martin Clynes
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Functional genomics analysis of low concentration of ethanol in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Role of genes involved in transcriptional and translational processes.

Authors:  Francisco Castaneda; Sigrid Rosin-Steiner; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  The hepatic transcriptome in human liver disease.

Authors:  Nicholas A Shackel; Devanshi Seth; Paul S Haber; Mark D Gorrell; Geoffrey W McCaughan
Journal:  Comp Hepatol       Date:  2006-11-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.