Literature DB >> 12537304

Task-specific expectation is revealed in scalp-recorded slow potentials.

Elena V Mnatsakanian1, Ina M Tarkka.   

Abstract

The contingent negative variation (CNV) is known as an electrical manifestation of expectancy, readiness and attention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether slow potentials recorded from the human scalp during the expectation to perform different tasks or during the expectation of the second stimulus in the pair demonstrate specificity regarding the type of visual stimuli. Participants were nineteen healthy adults. Each trial began with one of the two cues (S1) followed by consecutive pictures (S2 and S3). Each picture of this pair was a photograph of a familiar face with superimposed abstract dot pattern. One cue directed attention to compare faces and another to compare patterns. EEG was recorded with a 128-channel net. Slow potentials following S1 and S2 presentation (SP1 and SP2) are reported here for Face and Pattern tasks. The duration of each segment of the trial was 1500 ms from the stimulus onset, and here the last 1000 ms was analyzed. Statistical comparisons of amplitudes and current density mapping were performed. Within the same task, SP1-SP2 differences were complex, implying multiple dissimilarities in the processes during the two expectation periods. Slow potentials in SP1 differed between the tasks mostly in the anterior recording sites in 700-1500 ms. These latencies corresponded to the late CNV (or stimulus preceding negativity, SPN) showing task-specificity during SP1. For SP2, the differences were located centrally in 500-900 ms, the period that reflects the superimposition of processes generating the early CNV and the late positive complex. Task-specific differences appeared only in SP1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12537304     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021416406992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  4 in total

1.  Dissociating Two Stages of Preparation in the Stop Signal Task Using fMRI.

Authors:  Andre Chevrier; Douglas Cheyne; Simon Graham; Russell Schachar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A Neural Marker of Speech Intention: Evidence From Contingent Negative Variation.

Authors:  Juhi Kidwai; Jonathan S Brumberg; Brianna M Marsh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research.

Authors:  Joachim Gross; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth R Barnes; Richard N Henson; Arjan Hillebrand; Ole Jensen; Karim Jerbi; Vladimir Litvak; Burkhard Maess; Robert Oostenveld; Lauri Parkkonen; Jason R Taylor; Virginie van Wassenhove; Michael Wibral; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Exploitation of local and global information in predictive processing.

Authors:  Daniel S Kluger; Nico Broers; Marlen A Roehe; Moritz F Wurm; Niko A Busch; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.