Literature DB >> 12536327

Endoscopic versus operative treatment in high-risk ulcer bleeding patients - results of a randomised study.

Michael Imhof1, Christian Ohmann, Hans-Dietrich Röher, Holger Glutig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding is still a matter of controversy in high-risk patients with arterial bleeding or a visible vessel. Patients with recurrent bleeding during hospital stay carry an increased risk of death. Therapeutic concepts using early elective operation compete with solitary endoscopic treatment. Numerous prospective studies have contrasted comparable improvements for the different therapeutic regimens but there is still a lack of a randomised comparison. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We initiated a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing endoscopic fibrin glue injection with early elective operation in peptic ulcer patients with arterial bleeding or a visible vessel > or =2 mm. After initial endoscopic control of bleeding, patients were randomised to repeated fibrin glue injection or early elective operation. Outcome criteria were recurrent bleeding and death. The study was terminated after a planned interim analysis.
RESULTS: Due to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria 61 patients were randomised and 55 patients could be included in the per-protocol analysis, 23 in the early elective operation group and 32 in the patient group with endoscopic therapy. The type of surgery in the early elective operation group was usually gastric resection (79%). Recurrent bleeding occurred in 50% of the endoscopically treated patient group, and in the operative group in one patient (relative risk: 11.5; 95% CI: 1.6 to 80.7). There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups with respect to mortality (relative risk: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.1 to 4.8).
CONCLUSION: Early elective surgery is an effective procedure in bleeding peptic ulcer patients at high risk for re-bleeding. Fibrin glue injection carries a risk for re-bleeding, however, the majority of these re-bleeding episodes can be controlled by re-endoscopic treatment, but a subgroup will need an emergency operation with a fatal outcome in individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12536327     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-002-0329-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Gastrointestinal bleeding--concepts of surgical therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  W T Knoefel; A Rehders
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Emergency ulcer surgery.

Authors:  Constance W Lee; George A Sarosi
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 3.  Acute endoscopic intervention in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  R P Arasaradnam; M T Donnelly
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Erwin Biecker; Jörg Heller; Volker Schmitz; Frank Lammert; Tilman Sauerbruch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Bleeding Duodenal Ulcer: Strategies in High-Risk Ulcers.

Authors:  Markus Mille; Thomas Engelhardt; Albrecht Stier
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-12-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.