Literature DB >> 12535475

Methotrexate for induction of remission in refractory Crohn's disease.

A A Alfadhli1, J W McDonald, B G Feagan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although corticosteroids are effective for induction of remission of Crohn's disease, approximately 20% of patients who respond relapse when steroids are withdrawn and become steroid dependent (Binder 1985). Furthermore, corticosteroids exhibit significant adverse effects. The success of methotrexate as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis led to its evaluation in patients with refractory Crohn's disease. Methotrexate has been studied for induction of remission of refractory Crohn's disease and has become the principal alternative to azathioprine/6MP therapy. The evidence for its effectiveness has not been subjected to a systematic review.
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of the evidence for effectiveness of methotrexate for induction of remission in patients with active Crohn's disease in the presence and absence of concomitant steroid therapy. SEARCH STRATEGY: A computer-assisted search of MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant studies published in English, French, Spanish, Italian and German between 1966 and June 2002. Manual searches of reference lists from potentially relevant papers were performed to identify additional studies. The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the IBD Review Group Specialized Trials Register were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials involving patients of age > 17 years with refractory Crohn's disease defined by conventional clinical, radiological and endoscopic criteria, which was categorized as being active (Crohn's disease activity index >150). OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measure was the rate of induction of remission and complete withdrawal from steroids in the treatment and control groups after 16 weeks of treatment. A secondary outcome was induction of remission with reduction in steroid dose of at least 50%. Selection of trials: The results of the searches above were reviewed independently by two observers and relevant studies selected according to the predefined selection criteria. Any disagreement among reviewers was resolved by consensus. The same two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of each trial (details of randomization method, including whether intention-to-treat analysis was possible from the published data, number of patients lost to follow-up, and if a blinded outcome assessment was used). A standard data extraction form was used. Appropriateness of combining results: Trials were first reviewed to assess the clinical comparability of trial protocols and study populations. MAIN
RESULTS: Three randomized placebo-controlled trials were identified. The three studies differed with respect to participants, intervention, and outcomes to the extent that it was considered to be inappropriate to combine the data statistically. Two studies which employed low doses of methotrexate orally showed no statistically significant difference between methotrexate and placebo treated patients, and one which employed a higher dose intramuscularly showed substantial benefit (number needed to treat, NNT=5). Adverse effects were more common with high dose intramuscular methotrexate therapy than with placebo. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from a single large randomized trial on which to recommend the use of methotrexate 25 mg intramuscularly weekly for induction of remission and complete withdrawal from steroids in patients with refractory Crohn's disease. Although adverse effects are more common than with placebo, they were not severe. There is no evidence on which to base a recommendation for use of lower dose oral methotrexate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12535475     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  9 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults.

Authors:  M J Carter; A J Lobo; S P L Travis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Current evidence for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic literature review for the ASAS/EULAR management recommendations in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  J Zochling; D van der Heijde; M Dougados; J Braun
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Crohn's disease or abdominal tuberculosis?

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: current management.

Authors:  S P L Travis; E F Stange; M Lémann; T Oresland; Y Chowers; A Forbes; G D'Haens; G Kitis; A Cortot; C Prantera; P Marteau; J-F Colombel; P Gionchetti; Y Bouhnik; E Tiret; J Kroesen; M Starlinger; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  When combination therapy isn't working: emerging therapies for the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Suneeta Krishnareddy; Arun Swaminath
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  How important is onset of action in ulcerative colitis therapy?

Authors:  Steven Masson; David Nylander; John C Mansfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  [Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Crohn's disease - summary for the general practitioner].

Authors:  Jan C Preiss; Bernd Bokemeyer; Britta Siegmund; Eduard F Stange; Martin Zeitz; Jörg C Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2009-03-15

Review 8.  Targeting nanomedicines in the treatment of Crohn's disease: focus on certolizumab pegol (CDP870).

Authors:  Lotte Dinesen; Simon Travis
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2007

9.  Immunosuppressive therapies adversely affect blood biochemical parameters in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaobing Wang; Ge Wang; Jian Shang; Huaqin Pan; Xin A Zhang; Feng Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 1.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.