Literature DB >> 12535432

Terlipressin for acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage.

G Ioannou1, J Doust, D C Rockey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Terlipressin (triglycyl lysine vasopressin) is a synthetic analogue of vasopressin, which has been used in the treatment of acute variceal hemorrhage. In contrast to vasopressin, terlipressin can be administered as intermittent injections instead of continuous intravenous infusion and it has a safer adverse reactions profile. However, its effectiveness remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if treatment with terlipressin improves outcome in acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage and is safe. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomized clinical trials were identified by searching the following databases (November 1999): The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 1999), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis, and Current Contents. The bibliographies of identified publications were checked. Experts in the field and the manufacturers of terlipressin were contacted. For the update of this review, no new randomized clinical trials were identified on any of the databases (October 2002). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized clinical trials, which compared terlipressin with: (a) placebo or no treatment, (b) balloon tamponade, (c) endoscopic treatment, (d) octreotide, (e) somatostatin and (f) vasopressin, in the setting of acute variceal hemorrhage. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility, trial quality assessment and data extraction were done independently by two reviewers. The primary outcome measure was mortality. Secondary outcomes were failure of initial hemostasis, rebleeding, procedures required for uncontrolled bleeding or rebleeding, transfusion requirements and length of hospitalization. MAIN
RESULTS: Twenty studies were identified for all the comparison groups, involving 1609 patients. There were seven studies (with 443 patients) comparing terlipressin to placebo, five of which were considered to be high quality studies based on the Jadad scale. The meta-analysis indicates that terlipressin was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all cause mortality compared to placebo (relative risk 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.88). Three studies (with 302 patients) were identified comparing terlipressin to somatostatin, two of which were high quality studies; only one high quality study (219 patients) comparing terlipressin to endoscopic treatment was identified. Within the limited power provided by these small numbers of patients, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated between terlipressin and either somatostatin or endoscopic treatment in any of the outcomes. For the remaining comparison groups (terlipressin versus balloon tamponade, terlipressin versus octreotide, and terlipressin versus vasopressin) only small, low quality studies were identified and no difference was demonstrated in any of the major outcomes. There was no significant difference between the terlipressin group and any of the comparison groups in the number of adverse events that caused death or withdrawal of medication. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a 34% relative risk reduction in mortality, terlipressin should be considered to be effective in the treatment of acute variceal hemorrhage. Further, since no other vasoactive agent has been shown to reduce mortality in single studies or meta-analyses, terlipressin might be the vasoactive agent of choice in acute variceal bleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12535432     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  39 in total

1.  [6 years of the International Union of Societies of Immunology. Presidential report (Brighton 1974)].

Authors:  B Cinader
Journal:  Medicina (B Aires)       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.653

2.  Addition of Somatostatin After Successful Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Does not Prevent Early Rebleeding in Comparison to Placebo: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar; Sanjeev K Jha; Vibhu V Mittal; Praveen Sharma; Barjesh C Sharma; Shiv K Sarin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-16

Review 3.  Pathophysiology of portal hypertension and its clinical links.

Authors:  Yeon Seok Seo; Vijay H Shah
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-09

4.  Pharmacological Treatment in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Kelvin L Y Lam; John C T Wong; James Y W Lau
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Management of portal hypertension.

Authors:  D N Samonakis; C K Triantos; U Thalheimer; D W Patch; A K Burroughs
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  Mortality from cirrhosis: lack of progress over the last 35 years.

Authors:  C Gluud
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Historical overview and review of current day treatment in the management of acute variceal haemorrhage.

Authors:  Neil Rajoriya; Dhiraj Tripathi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Efficacy of vasopressin/terlipressin and somatostatin/octreotide for the prevention of early variceal rebleeding after the initial control of bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Juan Han; Liang Xiao; Chang-E Jin; Dong-Jian Li; Zhen Yang
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.047

9.  Therapeutic potential of targeting the renin angiotensin system in portal hypertension.

Authors:  Chandana B Herath; Josephine A Grace; Peter W Angus
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2013-02-15

10.  Terlipressin for catecholamine-resistant septic shock in children.

Authors:  Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez; Manuel Fernández-Sanmartín; Federico Martinón-Torres; Natalia González-Alonso; José María Martinón-Sánchez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.