Literature DB >> 12535036

The effectiveness and safety of spinal anaesthesia in the pyloromyotomy procedure.

Mostafa Somri1, Luis A Gaitini, Sonia J Vaida, Shelton Malatzkey, Edmond Sabo, Marina Yudashkin, Riad Tome.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is a relatively common disorder of the gastrointestinal tract in infancy, causing projectile vomiting and metabolic abnormalities. Surgical management in the form of pyloromyotomy under general anaesthesia has been reported as safe for relieving the obstructed bowel. A number of studies have demonstrated the advantages of spinal anaesthesia over general anaesthesia in high risk infants undergoing minor infraumbilical surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate spinal anaesthesia as an alternative option to general anaesthesia in infants undergoing pyloromyotomy.
METHODS: Twenty-five infants undergoing pyloromyotomy under spinal anaesthesia were studied. Haemodynamic and respiratory parameters were noted before performing the spinal block, 5 min after the spinal block, and every 10 min after performing the spinal block; for a total period of 30 min. The spinal block was performed using spinal isobaric bupivacaine 0.5%, 0.8 mg.kg-1. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation values were recorded.
RESULTS: The sensory levels achieved ranged between T3-T5 thoracic segments within 6-8 min and were sufficient to perform surgery in 23 cases. There were no statistically significant differences in the oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure and respiratory rate compared with before the spinal block and after 5, 10, 20 and 30 min.
CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes that spinal anaesthesia is an alternative option to general anaesthesia in infants undergoing pyloromyotomy, and should be considered in infants undergoing pyloromyotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12535036     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00972.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  6 in total

1.  Combined lumbar spinal and thoracic high-epidural regional anesthesia as an alternative to general anesthesia for high-risk patients undergoing gastrointestinal and colorectal surgery.

Authors:  James Skipworth; Attavar Srilekha; Dimitri Raptis; David O'Callaghan; Siri Siriwardhana; Romi Navaratnam
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Neuraxial analgesia in neonates and infants: a review of clinical and preclinical strategies for the development of safety and efficacy data.

Authors:  Suellen M Walker; Tony L Yaksh
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Ultrasound guided rectus sheath blockade compared to peri-operative local anesthetic infiltration in infants undergoing supraumbilical pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Anoop Kumar; Graham A M Wilson; Thomas E Engelhardt
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-04

4.  Spinal anesthesia in infants and children: A one year prospective audit.

Authors:  Devendra Verma; Udita Naithani; Chayenika Gokula
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

5.  Age-based Local Anesthetic Dosing in Pediatric Spinal Anesthesia: Evaluation of a New Formula - A Pilot Study in Indian Patients.

Authors:  S Parthasarathy; T Senthilkumar
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

6.  Epidural versus general anesthesia for open pyloromyotomy in infants: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Philipp Opfermann; Caspar Wiener; Werner Schmid; Markus Zadrazil; Martin Metzelder; Oliver Kimberger; Peter Marhofer
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.