OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical usefulness of published guidelines for the use of orlistat, by studying whether weight loss >/=2.5 kg during a 4 week dietary lead-in period, and weight losses of >/=5% after 12 weeks and >/=10% after 6 months of drug therapy predict weight loss and risk factor changes after 2 years. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of pooled data from 2 multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials with similar design. SETTING:Twenty-nine centres throughout Europe. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and twenty men and women (BMI 28-43 kg/m(2)) who completed 2 years of treatment. INTERVENTION: After a 4 week hypocaloric diet plus placebo, 2 years of treatment with orlistat 120 mg tid, plus a hypocaloric diet for the first year and a weight maintenance diet in year two. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight loss and obesity-related risk factor changes. RESULTS:Weight loss >/=5% body weight after 12 weeks of diet plus orlistat therapy was a good indicator of 2 year weight loss, whereas weight loss of >/=2.5 kg during the 4 week lead-in and >/=10% after 6 months did not add significantly to the prediction of 2 year outcomes. Patients who lost >/=5% of their weight at 12 weeks (n=104, 47.3%) lost significantly more weight after 2 years than others: -11.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) -13.4% to -10.3%) vs -4.7% (-5.7% to -3.7%) (P=0.0001), and had significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, insulin, and blood pressure. Among those who achieved >/=5% weight loss at 12 weeks, the overall health benefits were not significantly greater in patients who went on to lose >/=10% body weight at 6 months compared with those who did not achieve >/=10% weight loss by month 6. CONCLUSIONS: Of the criteria currently suggested for assessing response to orlistat treatment, weight loss of >/=5% at 12 weeks accurately predicts sustained improvements in weight and major risk factors at 2 years, while other suggested criteria are less useful.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical usefulness of published guidelines for the use of orlistat, by studying whether weight loss >/=2.5 kg during a 4 week dietary lead-in period, and weight losses of >/=5% after 12 weeks and >/=10% after 6 months of drug therapy predict weight loss and risk factor changes after 2 years. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of pooled data from 2 multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials with similar design. SETTING: Twenty-nine centres throughout Europe. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and twenty men and women (BMI 28-43 kg/m(2)) who completed 2 years of treatment. INTERVENTION: After a 4 week hypocaloric diet plus placebo, 2 years of treatment with orlistat 120 mg tid, plus a hypocaloric diet for the first year and a weight maintenance diet in year two. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weight loss and obesity-related risk factor changes. RESULTS:Weight loss >/=5% body weight after 12 weeks of diet plus orlistat therapy was a good indicator of 2 year weight loss, whereas weight loss of >/=2.5 kg during the 4 week lead-in and >/=10% after 6 months did not add significantly to the prediction of 2 year outcomes. Patients who lost >/=5% of their weight at 12 weeks (n=104, 47.3%) lost significantly more weight after 2 years than others: -11.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) -13.4% to -10.3%) vs -4.7% (-5.7% to -3.7%) (P=0.0001), and had significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, insulin, and blood pressure. Among those who achieved >/=5% weight loss at 12 weeks, the overall health benefits were not significantly greater in patients who went on to lose >/=10% body weight at 6 months compared with those who did not achieve >/=10% weight loss by month 6. CONCLUSIONS: Of the criteria currently suggested for assessing response to orlistat treatment, weight loss of >/=5% at 12 weeks accurately predicts sustained improvements in weight and major risk factors at 2 years, while other suggested criteria are less useful.
Authors: Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Jaehoon Lee; Lauren Ptomey; Erik Willis; Matt Schubert; Richard Washburn; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2016-02